banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Law Change In California Affects How You Buy And Sell a Horse

By: Bridget Brandon
Tel: (817) 454-4537
Email Ms. Brandon


View Profile on Experts.com.


Open-ended horse deals are quickly coming to an end. Florida has a statute (Section 535.16 of the Florida Statutes) and the California Legislature recently amended a similar one that now requires written documentation for horse sales. This change affects buyers and sellers whether as a private individual or as a business.

California Business and Professions Code § 19525 was modified and now requires the following:

  • All horse sale transactions must be accompanied by a written bill of sale signed by both the buyer and seller or their agents.
  • If an agent is acting on behalf of both the buyer and seller this "dual agency" must be disclosed in writing.
  • Any commission paid to an agent in an amount over $500 must be disclosed in the written bill of sale.

So you may ask yourself what can happen if a sales transaction occurs and the new statue is not followed? If someone files suit, a person injured by a violation of the statute will be able to recover treble damages from the other party. Treble damages are damages three times the amount of the actual damage. Now that is pretty significant. A lawsuit that did not seem worth pursuing may now be worth filing because of the higher potential of damages awarded.

A very common scenario for an equine transaction is the buyer and the seller have agents representing their interests. Both parties understand that commissions will be paid on the sale of the horse. The money is transferred through one of the agents, with the commissions being paid and the seller receiving his or her money. The transaction is either completed with no written documentation, or with a very simple bill of sale that does not specify the commissions that were paid and sometimes even the price of the horse to the buyer or the numeration going to the seller. Often, neither buyer or seller know the real dollars involved to one another and the agents. With this newly amended statute, an agent could be sued for not putting everything in writing even though there was an oral understanding of what was to be paid to each party. Not only that, but an agent could be liable for triple the amount of actual damages and the seller or buyer could be liable for what their agent put into the contract and signed as their representative.

You can comply with the law by using a properly written bill of sale for all transactions and to specify to whom commissions are being paid and the price of the horse. Since the statute was recently amended, it still needs to be interpreted by the courts. You should either hire an attorney to prepare your sales agreement, or at a minimum, hire an attorney to review your Sales Agreement before you sign one. The minimal cost is well worth it. Simply because there is a written bill of sale disclosing the price of the sale of the horse and commissions, the buyer or seller of a horse could still be involved in a lawsuit. The focus of the amended statute is on written disclosure of sales commissions and dual agency and does not address areas such as misrepresentation.

We understand that many of our clients feel this was an unnecessary change, however the fact remains that this is now the law. Times change, businesses change, and like in every other industry those involved must keep up with the changes or be at risk for more serious consequences.

Many individuals may not like the change in the law, but in reality, it is just good common business practice. Hopefully other states will follow suit.


Bridget Brandon is a Senior Certified Equine Appraiser with the American Society of Equine Appraisers and is USPAP Certified. Bridget has been a certified equine appraiser since 2001 and has worked on numerous equine related lawsuits as an appraiser, consultant and expert witness.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

valuemyhorse_logo.jpg

10/29/2012· Animals

The Texas House and Senate Pass Equine Dentistry Bill

By: Bridget Brandon

On May 30, 2011, the Texas Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners became one step away from having the authority to regulate non-veterinarian equine dentists.

expert_placeholder

9/24/2008· Animals

Record Keeping

By: Steven D. Nicely

This statement does not favor drug interdiction it favors the drug smuggler. When the court does not take a team's past into account and rule on the probability of finding drugs before the physical search begins they are allowing dogs that should not be on the street to remain on the street

Jill-Kessler-Dog-Expert-photo.jpg

11/5/2013· Animals

Tail Docking in Dogs: Historical Precedence and Modern Views

By: Jill Kessler Miller

Tail docking (amputation of the tail) has been done on dogs for hundreds of years. A variety of justifications have been offered, usually in accordance to the historical tasks of the breed. For instance, in hunting dogs, conventional wisdom said it was to prevent injury in the field from nettles, burrs or sticks; in herding or bull-baiting dogs it was thought to help avoid injury from large livestock.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo
;