Medical Errors: Take Flight with Patient Safety Originally published in Provider, September 2010 By: Kathleen Martin Tel: (973) 218-6267 Email Ms. Martin Website: www.kmartinconsulting.com

An error-reduction concept borrowed from aviation is ripe for application in long term and post-acute care.

MEDICAL ERRORS HAVE RECEIVED increased scrutiny in recent years. In 1999, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, "To Err is Human," found that medical errors were calculated to be the fifth-leading cause of death in the United States. Such errors are the cause of at least 98,000 deaths per year, according to IOM. But keep in mind that these numbers are estimates; no one knows how many errors go unrecognized or are simply not reported.

John Nance, MD, author of "Why Hospitals Should Fly: The Ultimate Flight Plan To Patient Safety and Quality Care," believes that the culture of health care is unsafe and incredibly dysfunctional.

"Though the culture of each health care organization is unique, they all suffer many of the same disabilities that have so far effectively stymied progress, including an authoritarian structure that devalues many workers, a lack of a sense of personal accountability, autonomous functioning, and major barriers to effective communication," Nance says in his book.

Communication Emphasized

The Joint Commission has deemed communication as the biggest root cause issue in patient safety. Health care operates in fragmented, silo-type facilities, which makes communication among a large team of caregivers complicated and bound to result in errors.

Medical errors are driven by issues similar to those that used to plague aviation. When properly applied, an aviation error reduction concept known as Crew Resource Management (CRM) provides an excellent approach that has a direct impact on patient safety in long term and post-acute care settings.

Much like aviation, medical care depends on a process being carried out by individuals with highly specialized expertise, each with distinct decisionmaking responsibility. Many accidents in these environments are not driven so much by errors made within any specific area of expertise, but rather breakdowns in communication or hand-offs that lead to a series of events resulting in extended hospital stays- or, worse yet, fatalities.

CRM was originally developed to enhance the safety of air transport and has been adopted by air carriers worldwide.

CRM began in 1979 during a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) workshop and is now a mandated requirement for most commercial pilots. NASA research found that the primary cause of most aviation accidents was human error and that many of the major problems were failures of interpersonal communication, leadership, and decision making in the cockpit.

The track record of aviation safety, especially since the rigorous introduction of CRM, speaks for itself with regard to the success of this innovative methodology.

Research Mounts

Further evidence of CRM's efficacy can be found in research results that show clinical error rates in hospitals were reduced from 30 percent to 4.4 percent (Marion, G., 2004) adverse outcomes were cut by 53 percent (Morey, J., 2002) and observed errors dropped 55 percent ("Beyond Blame: Solutions to America's Other Drug Problem: [DVD], Solana Beach. Calif.: Bridge Medical; 1997).

The Healthcare Excellence Institute puts it this way: "Imagine if the deaths due to medical errors were translated into aviation scenarios. The reported number of deaths due to medical errors in this country alone is at least 98,000 per year. In aviation terms, this rate would be equal to the fatal crashes of two fully loaded Boeing 737 airliners every day of the year. Certainly, that kind of safety record would trigger action on part of the traveling community, the aviation community, and lawmakers."

Aviation refuses to allow for such errors as this, yet health care error rates remain high. It is no wonder that regulatory bodies have incorporated the patient safety aspect as their No. 1 priority.

CRM is part of a broader strategy of building stronger teams, clarifying roles, and empowering both leaders and team members to raise safety concerns. The goal is to prevent work overload situations that compromise awareness that could lead to errors. CRM includes clear guidelines for how to delegate, how to build strong and cohesive teams, and how to conduct a formal debriefing.

The following strategies are utilized during the CRM process: standardized communications, team briefings, team debriefings, situational awareness, decision making, leadership strategies, effective teamwork, and critical language vocabulary and usage.

CRM improves patient safety on three distinct levels: Error avoidance, error trapping, and error mitigation (see box, below).

. . .Continue to read rest of article (PDF).