banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Working With An Expert Witness

By: Wendy Carlson
Tel: (214) 458-6009
Email Mr. Carlson


View Profile on Experts.com.


We appreciate Windle Turley, Esq. for his excellent lecture on "Working with an Expert Witness...the Plaintiff Attorney's Prospective."

Mr. Turley received his law degree in 1965, and has appeared seven times in D Magazine's "Top Lawyers" list and is a repeat selection for Texas Super Lawyers' List. When the Forensic Expert Witness Association held their meeting on January 28, 2010, he appeared as a delightful and insightful lecturer before a group of experts in varying fields.

Mr. Turley shared his view that "the Expert Witness is the life blood of your case." He went on to say that he has noticed an increasing hostility from judges toward expert witnesses.

Because the cost of retaining an expert is becoming increasingly high, and regulations such as binding arbitration are becoming mandated, Mr. Turley stated his belief that trial experts will soon become extinct unless a case has potentially significant value.

Mr. Turley outlined what an attorney-client should expect from the Expert:

  • A Reasonable Fee;
  • Honesty about the case;
  • Honesty about the Expert's history;
  • Availability to do the work requested;
  • The Expert's preparation for the case; and
  • Help with the attorney's preparation for the case.

In return, the Expert should expect the following from his attorney-client:

  • Respect and Courtesy;
  • Accommodation;
  • Retainer letter defining the scope of the project and how the Expert will be paid;
  • Early notification and ongoing updates;
  • Written questions the attorney plans on asking the Expert; and
  • A vigorous defense for Daubert challenges.

As an Expert, one should be willing and available to assist the attorney-client in proving the case. However, above all, honesty should always prevail, and an Expert should be an advocate for his opinion, not an advocate for the side that hired him.


Wendy Carlson, a Forensic Document Examiner, has studied handwriting examination and apprenticed under some of the leading court-qualified Forensic Document Experts in the U.S.A. such as: Bart Baggett, California; Robert Baier, New York and Don Lehew, Texas.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

mike_wakshull_photo.jpg

1/22/2018· Documentation Examination & Analysis

Discovery of a Cut-and-Paste Alteration Without the Source Signatures

By: Mike Wakshull

Generally, document examiners state that a source signatures is needed to show that the signature on a document is cut from another document then pasted onto the document in question. In this case study, a technique is presented to demonstrate how a cut-and-paste was discovered without the source signature.

Kathy-Carlson-Forensic-Document-Examiner-Photo-sm.jpg

2/18/2016· Documentation Examination & Analysis

Is Document Examination a Science?

By: Kathy Carlson

Forensic Scientists differ when defining document examination. Is it a science? If so, which science? What is our scientific analysis? Or, as some people believe, is document examination an art?

mike_wakshull_photo.jpg

1/27/2017· Documentation Examination & Analysis

Authenticity of Questioned Signature on Life Insurance After Brain Surgery

By: Mike Wakshull

The decedent signed a life insurance beneficiary form a few weeks after having brain surgery. The plaintiff claimed the signature was not executed by the decedent. The defense claimed that the decedent had signed the document and the differences are attributed to the effects of brain surgery.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo
;