banner ad

Visit Spiegel website
 
Deposition Designation Station
 

Economics Litigation Expert Witnesses

Sort Non-Featured Profiles by
< 1 2 >
Check for SynapsUs
Steven G. Roberts
CPA/CFF, CFE, CCI, CGMA, FCPA
Sammamish WA 98074
USA
phone: 425-868-3330 ext.151
veritas-forensic-accounting-logo.jpg
Steven Roberts Forensic Accounting Expert PhotoSince 1987, Steven G. Roberts, CPA, CFF, CFE, CCI, CGMA, FCPA, has focused exclusively on Valuation, Economic Analysis, Economic Loss Measurement, Forensic Accounting, and Fraud Examination. His assignments regularly include expert report and exhibit preparation, and deposition and courtroom testimony. Other of his engagements include arbitration, mediation and appraisal testimony.

Mr. Roberts has also been retained directly by the court as a Special Master relative to economic loss measurement and forensic accounting issues. He is a Certified Public Accountant, Certified Fraud Examiner and Forensic Certified Public Accountant. He is also certified by the AICPA in Financial Forensics, is a Certified Criminal Investigator, and is a member of the Academy of Court Appointed Special Masters. Over the past 29 years, Mr. Roberts has been directly responsible for designing, implementing and managing more than 2,000 engagements involving billions of dollars.

He has managed economic loss and valuation engagements in Alaska, Europe, across North America, in Mexico, and throughout the Gulf and Pacific Rim. He is a speaker, lecturer and author of courses and articles on economic damage measurement principles, forensic accounting issues and independent expert practices. Mr. Roberts is the principal and founder of Veritas Forensic Accounting and Economics.

Areas of Expertise:

  • Breach of Contract
  • Breach of Fiduciary Duty
  • Business Interruption
  • Business Dissolution
  • Economic Viability
  • Class Actions
  • Bellwether Plaintiffs
  • Construction Defect Issues
  • Construction Delay, Cost Overrun
  • Builder's Risk Policies
  • Employee Dishonesty
  • Receivership
  • Bankruptcy
  • Fraud
  • Insurance Loss
  • Inventory Loss
  • Property Damage
  • Intellectual Property
  • Partner Disputes
  • Personal Injury
  • Wrongful Death
  • Product Liability
  • Securities Damages
  • Wrongful Termination


  • View Steven Roberts' Consulting Profile.
    Check for SynapsUs
    Thomas Roney
    President
    3333 Lee Parkway,Suite 600
    Dallas, TX 75219
    CO TX FL USA
    phone: 214-665-9458
    fax: 214-975-1245
    thomas-roney-photo.jpg
    Thomas Roney, LLC is a national economic consulting firm specializing in Economic Damages Calculations and expert testimony for plaintiff and defense attorneys throughout the country. Our team of experienced experts, including economists, finance and forensic accountants, serves you in a professional, timely and cost-effective manner. We are experienced litigation consultants and have testified in Texas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Kansas and New York. With offices in Dallas/Fort Worth and Houston, we focus on:
    • Commercial damages and intellectual property
    • Economic Damages in Personal Injury, Wrongful Death, and Wrongful Termination.
    • Medical Malpractice and Valuation of Care Cost Plans.
    • Consulting Services/Critique of opposing expert for defense and plaintiff firms.
    • We also provide financial expertise in matrimonial disputes.
    Headquartered in Dallas, Texas, Thomas Roney LLC has offices in:

    Florida Office:
    1111 Brickell Avenue, 11th Floor
    Miami, FL 33126
    T: 305-913-8571
    Colorado Office:
    999 18th Street, Suite 3000
    Denver, CO 80202
    T: 303-572-2366
    12/28/2006 · Expert Witnessing
    As an attorney, plaintiff or defense, you face this question in every case with economic damages. You know not every case requires an economic expert. When the economic damages are minimal or easily computed, such as past wage or profit losses, an expert may not be necessary

    Check for SynapsUs
    Managing Principal
    Litigation Economics, LLC
    Wells Fargo Center
    100 South Ashley Drive, Suite 600
    Tampa FL 33602
    USA
    phone: 800-479-2341 / Cell: 650-868-6398
    Stanley P. Stephenson, Ph.D. Economics, has provided Economic Litigation services in more than 400 cases. His experience includes Business Valuations, Economic and Quantitative Analysis and Market Assessments.

    Dr. Stephenson's Expert Witness services are provided to defense counsel and plaintiff attorneys. He has been involved cases in various industries including high-tech manufacturing, software development, agricultural product processing, auto accessories, hotel, real estate, eating & drinking establishments, pharmaceutical, chemical, hospital, insurance, transportation, professional sports, retail, petroleum and cosmetics.

    Services Include:
  • Breach of Contract
  • Intellectual Property
  • Business Interruption
  • Medical Malpractice
  • Business Valuation
  • Personal Injury
  • Construction
  • Products Liability
  • Employment Related Claims
  • Wrongful Death
  • 5/28/2013 · Construction
    Defects that were introduced during construction can lead to classic legal disputes between owners and contractors where considerable sums of money are involved.

    4/17/2013 · Damages
    This paper focuses on business interruption litigation and how to compute lost profits as a remedy. The main contribution of the paper is development of a general model of economic damages which assesses lost profits by measuring the incremental changes in revenue, variable costs, and fixed costs.

    3/15/2013 · Damages
    Proving damages in trademark litigation-typically lost profits or disgorgement of the defendant's profits-generally involves citing the infringer's sales of the infringing product.

    1/30/2013 · Construction
    Defects introduced in construction can lead to classic legal disputes between owners and contractors, especially when considerable sums of money are involved. What can a commercial mortgage broker learn from these disputes? What risks and potential rewards might arise?

    11/26/2012 · Damages
    Survival risk of new businesses is a challenging issue to incorporate into lost profits analyses used in litigation, an issue some financial experts and courts ignore rather than consider explicitly. This paper considers several ways to make qualitative and quantitative adjustments for the survival rates of new businesses.

    10/25/2012 · Damages
    The forensic financial expert may be familiar with assessing lost profits, earnings capacity, or even valuing a business, but what is the expert to do about damages arising from lost ability to engage in non-market work? In a personal injury, wronful death or similar tort cases, physical limitations may restrict market and non-market work the latter forming the basis for an additional source of damages.

    Check for SynapsUs
    Dr. Stan V. Smith
    President & Founder
    1165 N. Clark Street, Suite 600
    Chicago IL 60610-2845
    USA
    phone: 312-943-1551
    fax: 312-943-1016
    stan_smith_photo.jpg
    Dr. Stan V. Smith is a nationally renowned Economist and Financial Consultant providing analysis in simple terms that any trier-of-fact can understand. As an expert consultant to plaintiff and defense attorneys representing clients in Federal State courts, he provides testimony and litigation support services in evaluating damages.

    Dr. Smith provides Analysis, Testimony, and Litigation Support Services in Evaluating Damages for plaintiff and defense attorneys representing clients in federal and state courts nationwide. His concept of Hedonic Damages is acknowledged by judges, attorneys, and legal journalists as one of the most innovative tort concepts in the last 30 years. He has been interviewed and published in dozens of respected professional journals.

    Dr. Smith has assisted in the successful resolution of thousands of lawsuits on behalf of clients that include many dozens of the nation's largest law firms, the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as thousands of other prominent plaintiff and defense law firms in almost every state.

    Areas of Expertise:
  • Antitrust Damages
  • Patent Valuation
  • Lost Wages
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Business Valuations & Losses
  • Hedonic Damages
  • Pension Fund Evaluation and Withdrawal Liability
  • Society and Relationship Damage Analysis
  • Identity Theft and FCRA Credit Damages
  • Security Losses
  • Commercial Damages
  • Employment Discrimination
  • Life Care Plan and other Medical Cost Evaluations
  • Structured Settlement Analysis
  • Personal Consumption and Fringe Benefits
  • Product Liability
  • Injury Losses
  • Lost Earnings Capacity
  • 5/6/2011 · Economics
    Setting aside the one case in 100,000 that makes headlines, are juries generally capricious and liberal? Are verdicts frequently unreasonable?

    3/17/2011 · Economics
    The increased use of economic experts in commercial damage cases, as well as in personal injury and wrongful death cases, has resulted in the emergence of a group of experts who offer economic services but are unqualified and ill-trained in economics.

    2/16/2011 · Economics
    In most courts, the value of a human being is not recognized. According to the laws of many states, your life isn't worth a "plugged nickel" if you no longer work.

    Check for SynapsUs
    Patrick Chylinski, MAFF, CVA, CFE
    515 South Flower Street 41st Floor
    Los Angeles CA 90071-2201
    USA
    phone: 213-330-4605
    RSM-Logo.gif
    RSM US, LLP is the 5th largest Accounting and Consulting Firm in the country, with over 85 offices across the United States. Our litigation consulting and financial forensics practice focuses on assisting counsel and clients in the areas of business and commercial litigation matters, forensic and fraud investigations, contract compliance matters, and royalty inspections.

    Our professionals have extensive experience assessing and quantifying damages in a variety of matters including contract disputes, post-closing and post-acquisition disputes, breach of fiduciary duty matters, real estate disputes, fee disputes, partnership disputes, as well as conducting analysis in forensic and fraud matters.

    Industry experience includes, among others, technology, manufacturing, hospitality, government and public sector, banking, consumer products, real estate, financial services, and entertainment. Our team of consultants has qualifications, certifications, and educational experience that include Certified Public Account (CPA), Master Analyst in Financial Forensics (MAFF), Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE), Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF), Certified Valuation Analyst (CVA), MBA, and JD.

    Our professionals have experience testifying at deposition, arbitration, and trial and have experience working in the following types of matters:
    • Economic Damage Analysis
    • Fee Disputes
    • Billing Disputes
    • Breach of Contract Matters
    • Post-acquisition Disputes
    • Earn-out Disputes
    • Fraud Investigations
    • Forensic Investigations
    • Breach of Fiduciary Duty Matters
    • Business Interruption Matters
  • Construction Claims
  • Covenant Not To Compete Matters
  • Business Valuations
  • Contract Compliance / Royalty Investigations
  • Health Care Litigation Matters
  • Insurance Claims & Coverage Disputes
  • Intellectual Property Related Matters
  • Marital Dissolution Matters
  • Purchase and Sale Disputes
  • Securities Litigation Matters
  • Patrick Chylinski Economic Damages Expert PhotoPatrick Chylinski, MAFF, CVA, CFE is a principal and the West Region Practice Leader for RSM’s Litigation Consulting and Financial Forensics practice. He has extensive experience managing and directing engagements relating to complex commercial litigation, business disputes, investigations of fraud and financial misconduct, and business valuations. He has been designated as an expert in numerous cases, and has testified as an expert in litigation matters relating to contract and fee disputes. Mr. Chylinski has experience serving clients across various industries including healthcare, financial services, real estate, construction, insurance, gaming, entertainment, and technology.

    Past experience includes roles as a Director of the Litigation Consulting and Forensic Accounting Services practice group for a top-25 national accounting and consulting firm, as well as a leadership position at a top regional firm. Earlier in his career, Patrick worked in the Financial Advisory Services group at Deloitte & Touche, focusing on dispute consulting.

    In addition to his work experience in professional services, Patrick has extensive industry experience, having worked as a Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis for what was one of the largest mortgage banking and financial services firms in the country. Patrick also worked in commercial real estate, performing financial analysis and mergers and acquisition due diligence at a commercial real estate investment firm. He also has experience in the securities industry, at one time holding NASD Series 7 and 63 licenses.

    Litigation and Dispute Services:
    • Contract Disputes
    • Fee Disputes
    • Damage Analysis
    • Lost Profit Analysis
    • Partnerships and Real Estate Disputes
    Forensic and Investigative Services:
    • Licensing and Royalty Disputes
    • Purchase Price / Earn-out Disputes
    • Forensic Analysis
    • Fraud Investigations
    • Contract Compliance
    8/20/2014 · Forgery & Fraud
    When many people think about fraud, their thoughts usually turn to banks, investment firms and large businesses. But don't be fooled. Not-for-profit organizations – including many charities, colleges, religious entities and trade groups – are often easy targets for sophisticated fraud schemes.

    Business acquisitions and dispositions are often highly complex transactions which can possess an increased potential for disagreements-disagreements that can eventually lead to contentious and costly litigation. Various types of disputes can arise from the purchase or sale of a business, and these post-closing or postacquisition disputes can delay or even derail what may otherwise appear as obvious "win-win" transactions.

    Check for SynapsUs
    G. Michael Phillips, PhD
    750 E. Walnut Street
    Pasadena CA 91101
    USA
    phone: 626-744-3540
    fax: 626-744-3530
    Phillips- Fractor-and-Company-Logo.gif
    Phillips, Fractor, and Company (PFC) is a boutique litigation support and consulting firm that specializes in Economic, Financial, Statistical, Managerial, Valuation, Accounting, and Complex Analyses.

    PFC's team is comprised of experts and consultants who blend active academic careers with real-world experience in a variety of fields. They draw on economic theory, statistical analysis, survey research, mathematics, computer science, business theories, and management best practices to conduct high quality research based on appropriate methodology to give precise insights into specific research problems which they clearly communicate in a variety of venues.

    Litigation Support / Testifying Experts - PFC's team of PhDs and other leading experts work closely with clients from the beginning to the end of each engagement, identifying key issues, selecting appropriate methodologies, conducting and supervising analysis, writing reports, and testifying or otherwise presenting results in a clear and understandable manner.

    Commercial Damages and Valuation Expertise:
    • Lost Profits - Business interruption, bad faith, faulty materials, transportation corridor closures, theft of trade secrets analysis. Analyze loss due to piracy, theft of trade secrets, unlicensed use of tools and plans, and intellectual property infringements
    • Commercial Damages - Estimate extensive damage or loss due to contract disputes, fraud and unfair competition, or negligence claims
    • Intellectual Property - Estimate losses and licenses associated with intellectual property. Apply advanced economic and statistical analysis, hedonic valuation methods, Georgia-Pacific factors, surveys, focus groups, analytical approaches, reasonable royalty analysis, cost savings estimates, industry "rules of thumb," meta-analysis, and other appropriate methodologies; brand and trademark confusion; market research surveys, focus groups, and analysis; utilization of online surveys for quantitative analysis and hypothesis testing; valuation of trade secrets, know-how, and proprietary processes; Hedonic Price Regression
    • Financial Analysis - Pro Forma analysis, deal analysis, simulations, "what if" analysis, real options valuation, and analysis of contracts. Competitive benchmarking, industry analysis, analysis of start-ups, cost of credit, credit rating damages, appropriate discount rates, weighted average cost of capital, cram down rates, and analysis of "but for" potential rates of return and appreciation
    • Investment Market Analysis - Analyzed hundreds of open market class action securities cases involving 10b-5, 33, and 34 act issues; investment valuation; event studies; options and derivatives valuation; portfolio construction; analysis of risk and return; analysis of investment characteristics; analysis of commissions; analysis of trading frequency; analysis of prudence; benchmark comparison and analysis; Index creation and analysis; ETFs, mutual funds, hedge funds, structured products, UITs, commercial banking; custom modeling
    • Investment Suitability - Link investor risk tolerance to investment characteristics; identify impact of investments on overall portfolio; model portfolio analysis; analyze impact of economy on investments and portfolios; UPIA; UPMIFA; managed accounts; PPM analysis; hedge funds; investment "systems"; quantitative modeling; surveys, focus groups, class census analysis; Real Options analysis; "what if" analysis; Monte Carlo & Simulation; Financial Econometrics
    • Internet Issues - Assess value by using statistics and econometrics to measure "internet presence"; test for trademark, URL, and brand confusion; start-up valuations; shadow stock valuation; domain name valuation; search engine confusion; unauthorized likeness
    • Industrial Organization & Competitive Analysis - Determine the competitiveness of markets including monopoly and monopsony power, concentration ratios, valuation of acquired interests, HSR analysis, pre-merger and acquisition analysis, securities valuation, financial analysis of contingent liabilities, real options analysis, industry analysis for trade associations and regulatory entities, econometric modeling and forecasting, and custom research
    • Entertainment Industry - Valuation, forecasting, modeling; statistical analysis of script content; royalty and licensing computation; quantitative analysis; special projects
    • Product Liability - Analyze customer records, perform actuarial type analysis on warranty claims and product failures, work with lemon law type issues, and perform surveys and focus groups to develop data regarding liability and damages
    • Real Estate & Urban Policy - Fiscal and economic impact analysis, financial analysis, and public private partnership/joint venture negotiations; eminent domain analysis; hedonic regression analysis; statistical valuation models; regional economic forecasting; analysis of public policy on local economy; impact of environmental issues on property values; impact of tax policy; special projects
    • Construction Defects & Destructive Testing - Create and supervise or evaluate sampling plans; compute margins of error; compute projections and extrapolations
    • Surveys & Sampling - Mail, telephonic, computer panel surveys; focus groups; questionnaires; intercept surveys; census; record sampling; warranty card analysis; Eveready, Sprite, and other marketing surveys; consumer expectation surveys; special projects
    • Statistics, Econometrics & Forecasting - Create forecasts, "what if" simulations and models, test hypotheses, and perform custom research
    • Class Action, Mass Actions, Mass Torts - Assess commonality, or lack thereof, using economic and statistical analysis; conduct census or surveys; design sampling for random depositions; analyze corporate records; special analysis
    View PFC's Consulting Profile.
    Check for SynapsUs
    G. Michael Phillips, PhD
    750 E. Walnut Street
    Pasadena CA 91101
    USA
    phone: 626-744-3540
    fax: 626-744-3530
    Phillips- Fractor-and-Company-Logo.gif
    Phillips, Fractor, and Company (PFC) is a boutique litigation support and consulting firm that specializes in Economic, Financial, Statistical, Managerial, Valuation, Accounting, and Complex Analyses.

    PFC's team is comprised of experts and consultants who blend active academic careers with real-world experience in a variety of fields. They draw on economic theory, statistical analysis, survey research, mathematics, computer science, business theories, and management best practices to conduct high quality research based on appropriate methodology to give precise insights into specific research problems which they clearly communicate in a variety of venues.

    Litigation Support / Testifying Experts - PFC's team of PhDs and other leading experts work closely with clients from the beginning to the end of each engagement, identifying key issues, selecting appropriate methodologies, conducting and supervising analysis, writing reports, and testifying or otherwise presenting results in a clear and understandable manner.

    Labor and Human Capital Related Expertise:
    • Asbestos & Toxic Torts - Assess damages to individuals or groups from toxic torts including asbestos. Experience includes economic loss from lost years, early death, disability, limited work life, work restrictions, and secondary damages including impact on dependents, shareholders, and companies
    • Wrongful Death, Personal Injury, Medical Malpractice - Estimate the present value of lost income, lost household services, lost personal services, personal consumption adjustments, and the value of life care plans. Estimate present values and annuity equivalent values of loss and economic losses from injury. Medical malpractice cases include “bad baby”, misdiagnosis, mistreatment, unlicensed technicians
    • Employment Benefits and Compensation Litigation & Valuation - Valuation of contracts, appropriateness of executive compensation, valuation of stock options and incentive compensation plans, and valuation of private interests. Value wrongful termination, wrongful recruitment, failure to promote, constructive discharge, ADA "failure to accommodate," fraud, whistle blower, retribution, retaliation, etc.
    • Employment & Compensation Class Actions - Analyze allegations of unpaid meal and rest breaks, unreimbursed expenses, analysis of payroll rounding policies, misclassification and job content analysis, analysis of inside worker exemptions, impact of nontraditional work schedules, unpaid and underpaid overtime, and many issues associated with prevailing wage laws
    • Discrimination and Disparate Impacts - Analyze testing underrepresentation, failure to promote, income disparity, disparate impact of policy, biased pay policies, etc. Cases involve age, race, gender, orientation, religion, national origin, affiliation, and ADA related issues
    • Family Law Issues, Valuations, Appropriate Compensation Analysis - Valuation of real and personal property and community and separate property, applying business valuation techniques, analyzing appropriate compensation, valuing investment portfolios and pensions, estimating future cash needs, analyzing impact of different regional cost of living, determining value of privately held businesses, and other accounting, financial, and economic applications
    • Product Liability - Analyze customer records, perform actuarial type analysis on warranty claims and product failures, work with lemon law type issues, and perform surveys and focus groups to develop data regarding liability and damages in a wide range of product liability cases
    • Surveys & Sampling - Provide sampling and analytical services to government agencies, trade associations, corporations, and litigants. Common applications include selecting employee records to determine the estimated impact of a compensation policy and selecting purchasers of a particular consumer item to test failure rates, determining sampling frame for randomized depositions, and creating, implementing, and analyzing surveys, focus groups, census type studies, and other types of survey and questionnaire analysis
    • Statistics, Econometrics, & Forecasting - Create forecasts, "what if" simulations and models, test hypotheses, and perform custom research. Determine excessive stock trading, impact of alternative investment policies on portfolio risk and return, determine "but for" promotion patterns to assess potential glass ceiling effects, and forecast long term housing starts
    • Class Actions, Mass Actions, Mass Torts - Assess commonality, or lack thereof, using economic and statistical analysis. Cases have included discrimination in a nationwide vehicle lease agreement, damages under various FLSA claims, impact on customers of tainted pharmaceutical products, wind turbine abnormally high failure rate
    View PFC's Consulting Profile.
    Check for SynapsUs
    EJ Janik, CPA, CFF, CFE
    President
    Plaza of the Americas
    600 N. Pearl Street, Suite 2255, LB 140
    Dallas TX 75201
    USA
    phone: 214-720-9192
    fax: 214-720-9193
    Janik-PC-Business-Services-Logo.jpg
    EJ Janik Accounting Expert PhotoEJ Janik, CPA, CFF, CFE is a Certified Public Accountant with 33 years of professional experience. He specializes in financial audits, compilations and reviews, consulting for commercial litigation, antitrust matters, engineering and construction matters, real estate, and bankruptcy / business reorganizations matters. Mr. Janik holds a Master of Science in Accounting from Louisiana State University and a Bachelor of Commerce from Rice University. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants.

    Mr. Janik has provided over 150 financial audits and consulted in over 615 business disputes. He has provided expert testimony in over 74 matters including trial testimony in 46 trials in 8 states. Mr. Janik's accounting services include Damages/Lost Profit analysis, Forensic Accounting, Fraud Investigations, Fact Finding, Financial Analysis, and Expert Witness Testimony when necessary.

    Litigation Experience:
    • Antitrust/Pricing Issues
    • Audits
    • Bankruptcy Analysis
    • Business Interruption
    • Business Valuation
    • Construction Claims
    • Contract Disputes
    • Cost Determinations
    • Criminal Investigations
    • Damage Analysis/Critiques

  • Debt & Capital Analyses
  • Dispute Resolution
  • Due Diligence
  • Environmental Claims
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Forensic Accounting
  • Fraud Investigation/Analysis
  • Hazardous
  • Waste/Remediation
  • Insurance Claims

  • Lost Profits
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Real Estate
  • Royalties, Commissions, Income
  • Solvency
  • Superfund/Environmental Claims
  • Tracing
  • Valuations
  • Wastewater
  • White Collar Crimes
  • Mr. Janik is also uniquely qualified to measure construction claims and damages. With over 11 years of construction experience, he has accumulated over 13,000 Engineering and Construction (E&C) auditing hours, 10,000 E&C consulting hours, and 15,000 E&C supervised hours.

    Construction Claims Services include:
    • Acceleration
    • Change Orders
    • Costs
    • Defective Plans
    • Differing Site and Concealed Conditions
    • Direct Costs
    • Disruption
    • Evaluating Claims
  • Indirect Costs
  • Overhead
  • Payroll Fringe Burdens
  • Profit
  • Pre-Qualification Filings
  • Superfund / Hazardous Waste Sites
  • Terminations
  • Other Construction Issues
  • View EJ Janik's Consulting Profile.
    Check for SynapsUs
    Heinz E. Ickert, CPA/CFF, CFE, CVA
    See Multiple Locations Below
    OH, FL USA
    phone: 614-464-3343 (OH) 941 343-7620 (FL)
    Heinz-Ickert-Forensic-Accounting-Logo.jpg
    Heinz Ickert Forensic Accounting Expert PhotoHeinz E. Ickert, CPA/CFF, CFE, CVA, is a litigation and forensic expert with 35+ years of experience in Forensic and Investigative Accounting and litigation support.

    Mr. Ickert has extensive experience in the investigation, detection, and deterrence of Fraudulent Activity on the part of employees, management, and other third parties. He has valued numerous privately held entities in potential merger and acquisition transactions or marital property settlement. His involvement in patent infringement, theft of trade secret, and copyright infringement has included computation of damages incurred and evaluation of opposing parties' expert reports.

    Litigation Support - Mr. Ickert's experience includes working with both plaintiff and defense counsel as a consultant and/or expert witness. His verbal and written communication skills have assisted juries and triers of fact in arriving at sound conclusions based on the facts of the case and evaluation of damages based on computations supported by sound economic principles and accepted methodologies. Mr. Ickert is able to unwind complex financial transactions and complicated subjects and render them comprehensible in nontechnical everyday language. He has experience testifying in state and federal court.

    Heinz Ickert provides a full range of forensic accounting, investigative, and litigation support services to legal counsel including:
    • Deciphering complex financial transactions and structures
    • Explaining advanced economic and financial concepts
    • Assisting with discovery in the preparation of complete interrogatories and requests for documents
    • Suggesting inquiries to be made of opposing parties or opposing experts in deposition or trial
    • Evaluating the merits of a case from a financial and economic standpoint
    Areas of Expertise:
    • Business Valuation
    • Bankruptcy
    • Commercial Damages
    • Business Interruption
    • Intellectual Property Matters
    • Lost Profits
    • CPA Malpractice
    • Damage Calculations
  • Fraud Detection, Deterrence
  • Domestic Relations Disputes
  • Construction Claims, Project Audits
  • Shareholder Disputes
  • Contract Damages
  • Royalty Disputes
  • Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Impairment of Value
  • View Heinz Ickert's Consulting Profile.

    Ohio Office
    150 E. Mound Street
    Suite 312
    Columbus, OH, 43215
    Telephone: 614-464-3343
    Florida Office
    2015 S. Tuttle Ave.
    PO Box 1418
    Sarasota, FL 34230
    Telephone: 941-343-7620
    Check for SynapsUs
    Scott D. Hampton, CPA, ABV, CFF
    Principal
    500 North Market Place Dr., Suite 200
    Centerville Utah 84014
    USA
    phone: 877-328-9888
    scott_hampton_photo.jpg
    Hampton IP is one of the nation’s most trusted Intellectual Property expert consulting and expert witness service firms.

    Over the course of the past three decades we have worked on more than 200 cases involving high-profile intellectual property valuations, economic damages calculations, financial impact analyses, patent, trademark and copyright issues, trade secrets, false advertising, breach of contract and construction and defect matters for major corporations and law firms throughout the nation. Hampton IP has been engaged by some of the most prominent law firms in the United States including Baker & McKenzie, K&L Gates, Reed Smith, McDermott Will & Emery, McGuire Woods, Nixon & Vanderhye, Perkins Coie, Davis Wright Tremaine, Milbank Tweed and Greenberg Traurig.

    Hampton IP employs some of the most experienced experts in the nation. Our principal consultant, Scott Hampton, began his career in 1986 and has earned a national reputation for his detailed, extremely thorough Rule 26 reports as well as his ability to provide articulate and convincing deposition and trial testimony.

    Because we focus primarily on intellectual property damages, we know how to quickly discover the relevant facts and evaluate the conditions of your claim. Our familiarity with intellectual property law gives us the ability to produce a solid report and expert testimony that can withstand intense scrutiny.

    Forensic & Investigative Services
  • Economic Remedy Calculations
  • Mediation Assistance
  • Expert Testimony
  • Fraud Investigations

  • We have the expertise to establish the impact of
  • Breach of Contract Disputes
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Fraudulent Behavior
  • Patent Infringement
  • Preliminary Injunctions
  • Royalty Disputes
  • Trade Dress Infringement
  • Trade Secret Misappropriation
  • Trademark Infringement

  • Scott D. Hampton is a CPA, ABV, CFF, and the founder of the Firm. He has over 27 years of forensic accounting experience valuing economic damages due to patent, trademark, and copyright infringement, and misappropriation of trade secrets.

    Check for SynapsUs
    Scott D. Gilbert, PhD
    206 Frances Ln.
    Carbondale IL 62901-1958
    USA
    phone: 618-319-2465
    fax: 708-575-7646
    Gilbert-Economics-Logo.gif
    Scott Gilbert Economics Expert PhotoScott D. Gilbert, PhD, has over 20 years of experience specializing in Economics and Statistics. He is an academic research economist, financial expert, and statistician, with banking sector experience.

    Dr. Gilbert received his PhD degree in economics in the year 1996, and before that worked as an economics research associate at the nation's central bank on the west coast, the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. He serves as associate editor of The American Statistician, and his academic research has been published in high-quality peer-reviewed journals in the fields of Economics, Statistics, and Finance. He also has 25 years of teaching experience in economics and statistics, at University of California San Diego, Claremont Graduate School, University of Mississippi, Southern Illinois University, and Webster University.

    Dr. Gilbert is a Member and Board member of AAEFE (American Academy of Economic and Financial Experts), a member of the NAFE (National Association of Forensic Economics), the AEA (American Economics Association), the National Bar Association, and the CPDE (Collegium of Pecuniary Damage Experts).

    Litigation Support - Dr. Gilbert provides expert witness and litigation support services on economic matters in tort and contract law, via the consulting firm Gilbert Economics. Since 1998, he has served as an economics expert on a range of legal matters, in cases filed in Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Kentucky, and Mississippi. As an expert witness he serves all Midwest states, and does not charge clients for travel time or expenses in the states of Arkansas, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Missouri, Minnesota, Tennessee, or Wisconsin.

    Dr. Gilbert uses his expertise in economics, statistics, and financial matters to assist both plaintiff and defense lawyers in tort and contract cases. As an academic and researcher, his approach to loss and damages estimation is modern and rigorous. Equally important for litigation matters, he knows that evidence documentation is key to developing useful expert opinions, and he assists attorneys in the discovery process. He also explains to lawyers weaknesses in opposing experts' views. His writing in this area has appeared in the Journal of the Missouri Bar Association, and more is (tentatively) forthcoming in the Illinois Bar Journal.

    Areas of Expertise:
    • Economic Damages
    • Personal Injury
    • Wrongful Death
    • Commercial, Contract Disputes
    • Divorce Valuation
  • Statistical Evidence - Hypothesis Testing
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Contract Disputes
  • Statistical Evidence-Regression Analysis
  • Scott Gilbert, PhD
    This book covers the subject of economic damages and its role in insurance claims and lawsuits against businesses. After reading and understanding this book, the reader will be able to identify economic damages as a component of business liability, describe the business risk posed by economic damages, explain the key determinants of economic damages, and estimate economic damages and business loss in a variety of cases.
    Check for SynapsUs
    Malcolm S. Cohen, PhD
    President
    305 E. Eisenhower Pkwy., Ste 316
    Ann Arbor MI 48108
    USA
    phone: 734-846-0549
    Malcolm-Cohen-Economics-Employment-Expert-Photo.jpg
    Malcolm S. Cohen, PhD, President of Employment Research Corporation, has over 30 years of experience in the field of Economics and Employment specializing in Labor Markets and Statistical Analysis.

    Dr. Cohen founded the firm in 1997, after retiring as the Director of the Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations at the University of Michigan, which he directed for 13 years. With a PhD in Economics from the MIT in 1967, his research interests include labor market information, labor turnover, employment forecasting and labor shortages. He has directed several major studies to identify national shortage occupations and measure labor turnover using administrative records.

    Dr. Cohen's book, Labor Shortages as America Approaches the Twenty-first Century, was published by the University of Michigan Press. His most recent book, Global Skill Shortages, written with Professor Mahmood A. Zaidi, is published by Edward Elgar Publishing. He has had articles published in a large number of journals, including: Journal of Human Resources, Monthly Labor Review, Journal of Political Economy, Review of Economic Statistics, Journal of Economic Theory, and The American Economic Review.

    Litigation Support - Dr. Cohen has either testified or been a consultant in over 1,000 audits or cases and has testified over 150 times. He has also served as an expert to the EEOC and U.S. Department of Labor in discrimination cases, and has directed many research projects sponsored by government agencies.

    Areas of Expertise:
    • Employment Discrimination
    • Economic Loss
    • Personal Injury
    • Statistical Analysis
    • Wrongful Death
    • Affirmative Action
    • EEOC
    • Compensation
    • FELA
    • FLSA
  • Labor Economics
  • Mitigation of Damages
  • Wage and Hour Issues
  • Wrongful Termination
  • Earnings Analysis
  • Damage Analysis
  • Reduction in Force
  • RIF
  • OFCCP
  • Class Action
  • View Dr. Cohen's Consulting Profile.
    Malcom S. Cohen, PhD
    As the world entered the twenty-first century, global skill shortages in many occupations were evident throughout the world. While these were mitigated by a global recession, there is no generally agreed upon method for measuring these shortages. This book discusses various theories for measurement. Using data collected from 19 developed countries in North and Latin America, Europe, and the Pacific region, the authors explore various aspects of skilled labor shortages, develop a methodology of measuring shortages by occupation, and provide estimates of the likelihood of the occurrence of such shortages.
    Malcom S. Cohen, PhD
    Predicting labor shortages is of great importance for planning education and training of the nation's present and future labor force. Malcolm Cohen has developed an innovative approach to measuring labor shortages. Originally sponsored by the U.S. Department of Labor, his work is presented here, updated for 1994.
    Check for SynapsUs
    Dr. Edmund H. Mantell
    Economist and Expert Witness
    5 Carthage Lane
    Scarsdale NY 10583
    USA
    phone: 914-725-4882
    fax: 914-722-4147
    Dr. Edmund H. Mantell, Ph.D. is a Consulting Economist and Expert Witness who has been engaged by both Plaintiffs and Defendants. His services are provided rapidly and efficiently.

    Services:
  • Calculations of the loss of earnings and the loss of fringe benefits in personal injury or wrongful death cases
  • Projections of the costs of future care for seriously disabled persons; therapeutic modalities, pharmaceuticals, custodial care, treatment by physicians

    Areas of Expertise:
  • Case Review
  • Forensic Economics
  • Wrongful Death
  • Personal Injury
  • Lost Earnings
  • Securities Experts
  • Spousal Evaluation
  • Economic Damages
  • Calculation of Loss

  • Antitrust
  • Financial Damages
  • Intellectual Property
  • Infringement Damages
  • Disability & Loss of Income
  • Cost of Future Care
  • Trial Exhibit Preparation
  • Analysis of Reports
  • Structured Settlements
  • Check for SynapsUs
    Prof. J. Gregory Sidak
    1717 K Street, NW
    Suite 900
    Washington DC 20006
    USA
    phone: 202-518-5121
    gregory-sidak-logo.jpg
    Gregory Sidak Antitrust Economics ExpertJ. Gregory Sidak is an Expert Economist in the fields of Damages, Antitrust, Patent, Telecommunications Regulation, Commercial and Investment Arbitration, and Intellectual Property Law. Prof. Sidak is Chairman of Criterion Economics, L.L.C. in Washington, D.C. The focus of his research has been regulation of network industries, antitrust policy, the Internet and electronic commerce, intellectual property, and constitutional law issues concerning economic regulation.

    Prof. Sidak formerly served as Deputy General Counsel of the Federal Communications Commission and as Senior Counsel and Economist to the Council of Economic Advisers in the Executive Office of the President. His writings have been cited by the Supreme Court of the United States, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and lower state supreme courts. He has also been cited by the Supreme Court of Canada, the European Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, and other regulatory agencies.

    In a typical engagement, Gregory Sidak assists senior management and outside counsel in devising and executing a litigation or regulatory strategy for addressing a consequential challenge or opportunity. Although he also serves as a court-appointed neutral expert, his typical clients are Fortune 500 companies or their overseas counterparts. Prof. Sidak's comparative advantage is applying economic analysis to novel legal questions that can materially affect the company’s enterprise value. He excels at communicating to legal decision makers the relevance of that economic analysis to answering the pertinent legal questions.

    Areas of Expertise:
    • Damages and Valuation - Trade Secrets, Trademark, Trade Dress, Copyright Infringement, False Advertising, Licensing (Know-How), Patents
    • Technology Disputes
    • Claims of Monopolization Antitrust & Unfair Competition
    • Administrative Proceedings
    • Price-Fixing & Dominance Allegations
    • Trade & Distribution Agreements
    • Competition Regulation and Enforcement in the US and EU
    View Consulting Profile.
    6/17/2015 · Telecommunication
    Regulators in many countries have asserted that setting asymmetric mobile termination rates (MTRs) between the incumbent mobile telephony operator and its smaller rivals is an efficacious means by which to help entrants attain efficient scale. We investigate empirically the efficacy of this policy experiment using data from a global sample of 34 countries from 1996 through 2014. We estimate a model that relates operators' long-run market shares to initial entry conditions and the degree of asymmetry among MTRs using an instrumental variables (IV) strategy. The estimates imply that a high degree of asymmetry among MTRs lowers an entrant's long-run market share by roughly 4 percentage points compared with a regime of symmetric MTRs, and the effect is roughly constant across market penetration levels. Furthermore, mobile operators tend to perform better when entering markets with higher levels of concentration and lower levels of market penetration. Our novel findings cast doubt on the efficacy of imposing asymmetric MTRs as a means to achieve greater equality of competitive outcomes. Our findings inform the larger body of theoretical literature on the pricing of interconnection and network access.

    5/18/2015 · Patents
    Under what conditions may the holder of standard-essential patents (SEPs) seek to enjoin an infringing implementer without breaching the SEP holder's contract with the standard-setting organization (SSO) to provide access to those SEPs on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) terms? I show that the SEP holder's contractual obligations still permit it to seek an injunction. A FRAND commitment requires the SEP holder to offer a license for the SEPs on FRAND terms (or otherwise to grant implementers access to the SEPs). Extending an offer containing a price within the FRAND range discharges the SEP holder's contractual obligation.

    4/17/2015 · Telecommunication
    In 2005, Ofcom, then telecommunications regulator in the United Kingdom, implemented functional separation of British Telecom plc (BT), separating its wholesale and retail services. BT established a division within the company, Openreach, to provide equal access to its local access network and backhaul products. The tenth anniversary of this regulatory and corporate experiment is an appropriate moment to ask whether functionally separating Openreach from BT benefited consumers. We find that Openreach's creation generated short-run consumer benefits in the form of lower prices but also led to negative long-run effects, which outweighed the short-term price reduction.

    3/18/2015 · Insurance
    Google distributes proprietary applications for its open-source Android mobile operating system (OS) free of charge. Some of those applications (apps) are offered together as a suite of apps known as Google Mobile Services (GMS). Manufacturers of mobile devices can agree, pursuant to Google's Mobile Application Distribution Agreement (MADA), to install the suite of apps on their devices at a price of zero. Some theorize that Google's policy of offering some applications together as a suite of apps harms competitors or menaces consumer welfare.

    2/10/2015 · Patents
    Mark Lemley and Carl Shapiro propose that standard-setting organizations (SSOs) mandate that their members henceforth submit to binding, final-offer arbitration (commonly called "baseball arbitration") to set fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) royalties in licensing disputes concerning standard-essential patents (SEPs). SSOs should reject this proposal. It does not rest on sufficient facts or data, nor does it apply intellectually rigorous principles and methods of law and economics in a reliable manner. This is not to say that the voluntary use of arbitration to resolve FRAND licensing disputes is inherently problematic. However, the incremental efficiency that Lemley and Shapiro claim that their proposal would achieve over litigation or conventional commercial arbitration is illusory. For one, it is much harder to value a portfolio of SEPs over the span of five years than to value an individual baseball player for a single season.

    1/8/2015 · Patents
    What does it mean for a patent holder to commit to a standard-setting organization (SSO) to license its standard-essential patents (SEPs) on fair, reasonable, and nondiscriminatory (FRAND) terms? When is a royalty FRAND? Drawing from both legal theory and economic theory, I propose an interpretation of FRAND that distinguishes and reconciles the conflicting definitions of FRANDand provides courts a practical approach to identifying FRAND royalties

    12/4/2014 · Economics
    Complex civil litigation routinely includes expert economic testimony. However, determining which expert economist is more credible may confound a lay jury. It may even confound the judge when ruling on the admissibility of expert economic testimony during the Daubert hearing.1 One solution rarely employed is for the court to appoint its own neutral economic expert under Rule 706 of the Federal Rules of Evidence2 when a lawsuit contains a claim for damages that will require rigorous analysis of data. Based on my recent experience as Judge Richard Posner's court-appointed neutral economic expert on damages in patent infringement litigation, I explain in this article how the wider use of Rule 706 would assist the judge and jury and would facilitate the prompt settlement of intellectual property, antitrust, securities, contract, business tort, and other complex disputes.3 The benefits to courts and litigants would surely exceed the costs.

    9/23/2014 · Telecommunication
    As part of the Modification of Final Judgment (MFJ) that implemented the divestiture of the Bell operating companies (BOCs) from AT&T on January 1, 1984, the BOCs were forbidden to carry telephone calls from one local access and transport area LATA) to another. Although the Telecommunications Act of 1996 superseded the MFJ, it retained the BOCs' interLATA prohibition and established, in section 271, a process – involving each state public utilities commission, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), and the Department of Justice (DOJ), acting on a state-by-state basis – by which the BOCs could earn regulatory approval to enter the interLATA market within the regions in which they provide local exchange service. As of September 1, 2002, the BOCs had received section 271 authorizations to provide in-region interLATA service in fifteen states.

    8/19/2014 · Antitrust
    A recent phenomenon in competition policy is the acquisition of a private firm by an enterprise that is either wholly owned by government or in the midst of privatization. Such an acquisition poses the question of how public ownership may alter the incentives of a firm to engage in anticompetitive conduct. It also prompts one to examine the process by which such altered incentives revert, as the level of government ownership declines, to the same incentives that face purely private firms. Using Deutsche Telekom's acquisition of VoiceStream Wireless as a case study, this article presents the economic questions relevant to evaluating the competitive consequences of acquisitions by partially privatized firms. It predicts gains or losses to various constituencies of producer groups.

    7/15/2014 · Antitrust
    In this review of John Lott's book, Are Predatory Commitments Credible?: Who Should the Courts Believe?, we find that Lott is more successful in pointing out the likelihood of predatory pricing by public enterprises than in proving that predatory pricing by private enterprises does not occur. In Part I of this Review, we critique Lott's theoretical and empirical attempts to show that predatory pricing by private firms is implausible.

    6/6/2014 · Economics
    Mail delivery is one of the few economic activities that has avoided the wave of deregulation and privatization that has swept network industries over the last few decades. This Article examines several questions regarding the business activities of Canada Post Corporation in a competitive environment. What should be the appropriate mandate of Canada Post? If Canada Post is a natural monopoly, what form of regulation best serves Canadian consumers? If Canada Post's delivery of letter mail is not a natural monopoly, what basis exists for retaining Canada Post's current statutory monopoly? What potential exists for Canada Post to abuse its statutory monopoly-and other statutory privileges and immunities-to compete unfairly against efficient private suppliers of postal services?

    5/1/2014 · Economics
    Few phrases in public policy have become so overused so quickly as the information highway. Although it is unclear to many what that superhighway is or will be, this uncertainty has not prevented proposals to regulate the superhighway from being made. In this Article, we examine the economic principles that should govern competition and regulatory policies concerning the development and operation of the information superhighway.

    3/28/2014 · Antitrust
    Since 1975, when the debate over monopolistic predation began to boil in courts and universities, most discussion has focused on predatory pricing. And although the allegation of predatory innovation arose in some well-known litigation involving Kodak and IBM, lawyers and economists have produced little credible work explaining how this phenomenon can occur, let alone how it should be identified and remedied if deemed to threaten consumer welfare.

    2/19/2014 · Antitrust
    Antitrust law currently lacks a unified theory of liability and damages. But the Supreme Court's recent acceptance of consumer welfare as the goal of antitrust law underscores a growing judicial inclination to construe antitrust liability rules to encourage efficient production and efficient resource allocation. As the Court reconstructs the law of antitrust liability, it should also revise the law of antitrust damages by defining the rights created by those damage measures to accomplish specific economic goals.

    1/21/2014 · Antitrust
    A routine defensive tactic of targets of hostile tender offers is to seek a preliminary injunction under section 16 of the Clayton Act on the ground that the offeror's acquisition of the target's stock would effect a merger violating section 7 of the Act. The litigation costs that an antitrust injunction imposes on an offeror seems unlikely to exceed the offeror's risk-adjusted expected benefit from the takeover. In this Article, I discuss several reasons why the possibility of delay tendes to discourage a potential offeror from ever making a tender offer.

    12/13/2013 · Antitrust
    Through its antitrust enforcement system, society allocates resources to deter anticompetitive behavior. Antitrust enforcement is costly because prosecutors and judges mischaracterize some competitive or efficiency-enhancing behavior as horizontal collusion. In this early application of the Polinsky-Shavell argument about the tradeoff between the probability and magnitude of fines, this essay argues that, given prosecutorial and judicial error, society will not optimally allocate its antitrust enforcement resources by threatening price fixers with exorbitant economic penalties that have only a minimal probability of being enforced.

    11/11/2013 · Antitrust
    Current controversies over patent policy place standard-setting organizations (SSOs) on a collision course with antitrust law. Recent theoretical research conjectures that, in an SSO, patent owners can "hold up" patent users in the sense of demanding high royalties for a patented input after the SSO has adopted the patented technology as an industry standard and manufacturers within the SSO have incurred sunk costs to design end products that incorporate that standard.

    9/23/2013 · Antitrust
    We examine the consumer-welfare implications of Google's project to scan a large proportion of the world's books into digital form and to make these works accessible to consumers through Google Book Search (GBS). In response to a class action alleging copyright infringement, Google has agreed to a settlement with the plaintiffs, which include the Authors Guild and the Association of American Publishers.

    8/19/2013 · Antitrust
    We favor revision of the Horizontal Merger Guidelines.1 Our preliminary comments in this essay are based on a work in progress that we provisionally entitle, "Favoring Dynamic Competition over Static Competition."

    7/31/2013 · Antitrust
    Competition authorities in foreign jurisdictions have recently adopted or are considering guidelines on applying competition law to intellectual property rights (IPR). A common concern that certain exercises of IPR can restrict competition underlies IPR provisions that would enable competition authorities to compel holders of IPR to license their IP at regulated royalties.

    7/16/2013 · Antitrust
    The OECD's proposed regime of asymmetric ex ante regulation for Mexico's telecommunications marketplace would reduce competition, contrary to the OECD's aims. The OECD's proposals would harm Mexican consumers and force an increase in prices paid for telecommunications services. They would create a government-sanctioned price cartel among the telecommunications providers.

    6/24/2013 · Antitrust
    A recent phenomenon in competition policy is the acquisition of a private firm by an enterprise that is either wholly owned by government or in the midst of privatization.

    6/5/2013 · Antitrust
    agencies in the United States and the European Union began investigating Google's search practices in 2010. Google's critics have consisted mainly of its competitors, particularly Microsoft, Yelp, TripAdvisor, and other search engines.

    5/6/2013 · Antitrust
    The landmark Microsoft case raises challenging questions concerning antitrust remedies. In this Article, we propose a framework for assessing the costs and benefits of different remedies, particularly divestiture, in monopolization cases involving network industries.

    4/2/2013 · Antitrust
    What is the proper legal standard for product integration involving software? Because software is subject to low marginal costs, network effects, and rapid technological innovation, the Supreme Court's existing antitrust rules on tying arrangements, which evolved from industries not possessing such characteristics, are inappropriate.

    2/28/2013 · Antitrust
    A “price squeeze,” or “margin squeeze,” is a theory of antitrust liability under section 2 of the Sherman Act that concerns a vertically integrated monopolist that sells its upstream bottleneck input to firms that compete with the monopolist’s production of a downstream product sold to end users.

    The Telecommunications Act of 1996 sets forth extensive provisions to unbundle the local telecommunications network to encourage the development of a competitive market for local telephone.

    10/22/2012 · Antitrust
    The September 2009 announcement that the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice have initiated a review of the Horizontal Merger Guidelines provides a formal process for redefining the proper role of dynamic competition in antitrust law.

    J. Gregory Sidak, Dan Maldoom, Richard A.D. Marsden, Hal J. Singer
    The Brussels Round Table, a forum of leading EU telecommunications operators and equipment manufacturers, commissioned these articles. They examine the deployment of broadband in European countries and make policy recommendations related to telecommunications regulation. Specific topics include pricing flexibility, competition, growth potential, likely future dynamics, competition, investment opportunities, eliminating excess regulation, facilitating longer-term points of view, and suggestions for transparent and competition-neutral subsidies.
    J. Gregory Sidak
    This book addresses deregulatory policies that threaten to reduce or destroy the value of private property in network industries without any accompanying payment of just compensation, policies that are termed "deregulatory takings." The authors further consider the problem of renegotiation of the regulatory contract, which changes the terms and conditions of operation of utility companies.
    J. Gregory Sidak
    Restrictions on foreign investment in U.S. telecommunications firms have harmed the interests of American consumers and investors, argues J. Gregory Sidak in this convincing study. Sidak shows why these restrictions, originally intended to protect America from the perils of wireless telegraphy by foreign agents, should be repealed...
    Check for SynapsUs
    Dov Frishberg, PhD
    84 India Street
    Brooklyn NY 11222
    USA
    phone: 917-575-6312
    Dov-Frishberg-Economic-Damages-Finance-Expert-Photo.jpg
    Experienced Expert serving clients and attorneys involved in complex commercial cases requiring effective and convincing analytics in the areas of Economics, Statistics, Finance, and Business Analysis.
    < 1 2 >