
"Last Thursday the jury returned a verdict in favor of [our client] for approximately $1,200,000. Your work (as usual) was spectacular.Licensed by State of California as Certified Radiologic Technologist (Diagnostic and Therapeutic).
The testifying doctor commented to the jury about how good the medical illustrations were in representing the nature of the injury and the corrective work that was performed.
You have done so much work for me and other members of this firm which has allowed us to be more effective and better representatives for our clients. The clients have benefited from your careful skill tremendously.
Again, thank you for the work."

Areas of Animation Expertise:KSR v. Teleflex - Landmark unanimous U.S. Supreme Court case on obviousness regarding patent claims. The U.S. Solicitor General noted, "[The] petitioner has supplied an animation that helpfully illustrates the point." Sprint v. Vonage - $80 million settlement for DI client Sprint. Jurors said that DI's animated tutorial made Sprint's patent claims easy to understand. Affymetrix v. Illumina - $90 million settlement for DI client Affymetrix. DI’s graphics helped Affymetrix show that Illumina infringed several of its patents.
Intellectual Property: Mechanical Intellectual Property: Electronics Intellectual Property: Biotechnology Medical Devices Aviation Ground Vehicle General & Product Liability Construction

Presentations and graphics can greatly increase the effectiveness of your opening and closing arguments, and generally help your jury or judge retain a much higher level of information. So what’s the downside?