banner ad
Experts Logo


Case Study: Inventory Fire Loss

By: Jack Young
Tel: 530-795-5536
Email Mr. Young

View Profile on

Appraising inventory is generally one of my least favorite assignments; in the case of fire loss, however, even a static inventory can become more interesting, if only because of its absence. Combined with an absence of appropriate record keeping, the process of valuing the lost stock takes us into a level of detective work that can be both frustrating and rewarding.

My favorite fire loss inventory story involves a total fire loss of a used auto parts inventory for antique vehicles. Faced with a fairly detailed list of the items allegedly lost in the fire, I was doing some ebay research when I noticed that many of the items I found in the sold listings were identical to the lost items ... and had been sold in the few weeks following the fire! A quick investigation of the seller revealed that he and the insurance claimant were the same. Case closed.

In another case, where the list of items was not as detailed, and could not be verified with receipts or photos, I suggested counsel request tax returns that may have validated the subjected claims list for the total inventory value. Again, a rapid out of court settlement was reached regarding the insurance claim.

But not every case is so quickly resolved. In most fire loss or theft cases, the lost inventory does need to be valued, even when no one is completely sure what has been lost. In many cases, of course, a complete and verifiable inventory reported by the claimant has been found completely legitimate and the insurance company is grateful to learn that they have a reasonable claimant and can quickly settle the matter.

As always in a fire loss case, however, the valuation Scope of Work is limited because no inspection of the Subject Assets can be conducted. Lacking an inspection or photos of the assets, the fire loss or theft valuation process generally depends upon review of depositions and documents provided by the owners, bolstered with research of new and used markets, interviews with industry equipment experts, sales comparison and cost approach, consideration of obsolescence factors, and reconciliation to value. And, it cannot be overstated that with limited information available regarding the assets to be valued, the appraiser must also formulate and document the necessary appraisal specific Extraordinary Assumptions related to the insufficient descriptions, condition and age of the Subject Assets.

Extraordinary Assumption: An assumption, directly related to a specific assignment, as of the effective date of the assignment results, which, if found to be false, could alter the appraiser's opinions or conclusions. (from Valuing Machinery & Equipment, 3d edition)

Common practice in any retail business is to keep an inventory list of goods on hand and available for sale. These lists usually include information such as the SKU# (stock keeping unit) or other such identifying number, supplier, model, description (color, etc.), quantity on hand, cost per unit, location and any other information needed to conduct business. The need for retail businesses to keep a up to date physical inventory is addressed both by the IRS in the Retail Industry Handbook and by Financial Accounting Standards Board ASC330.

Inventory lists aren't always available, however. Sometimes they've been destroyed in the fire that destroyed the inventory. Sometimes the list never existed. In more than one inventory loss case calling for an equipment appraisal, depositions indicated that business owners did not keep any form of written or formal inventory. Inventory lists received appeared to rely entirely upon memory.

Fire Loss Case Study: Inventory

In one particular case, many descriptions failed to explain exactly what the asset was, the condition of the asset, and/or - in many cases - the quantity: i.e, "used fiberglass," "fiberglass unknown," "Blue barrel of rope," "Bucket of unknown contents," "Transformer," etc. It looked like a clear case of inadequate record keeping, indicating that the Asset List was compiled from memory. For items such as these, Extraordinary Assumptions were developed to support the necessary valuation research procedures. Did we "guess" at the quantities, qualities or conditions of the equipment to be appraised? No, we made an educated estimate based on our seasoned professional judgement:

Extraordinary Assumptions about the description and the appearance condition of the Subject Assets listed in Appendix A were based upon my estimate of what a typical subject for the given situation likely would be.

In this particular fire loss case, based on the industry involved and the overall contents of the inventory list, the blue barrel of rope was appraised as 20' of 9mm blue cord rope; the transformer was appraised as a EGS Hevi-duty 480 Delta 80/160 in fair condition. Other items were also categorized and quantified. Their values, and the values of other non-specified equipment and inventory in this particular case, made up a relatively small percentage of the final opinion of value. And yet these items did need to be valued and calculated into the final number for the insurance claim settlement.

This fire loss case, along with the restaurant case mentioned in the previous fire loss article, settled out of court, as most of these cases do. When Extraordinary Assumptions are clearly stated and thoroughly documented, they can play an important part in a defensible, reasonable equipment appraisal report.

If you have questions about appraisals for nonexistent assets, send me a tweet @JackYoung_ASA or contact me on LinkedIn. I look forward to discussing how Extraordinary Assumptions can help support values in equipment appraisals for fire loss or theft.

Jack Young, ASA, CPA is an Accredited Senior Appraiser (ASA) of the American Society of Appraisers specializing in Machinery and Equipment Appraisals and a Certified Public Accountant (CPA). Mr. Young has also been awarded a Master Personal Property Appraiser (MPPA) designation from the National Auctioneers Association. He has thousands of hours experience as an Equipment Appraiser and is an active member of the Northern California Chapter of the ASA, where he serves as Chapter President.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved


Related articles


8/1/2016· Appraisal & Valuation

Factors in Appraising for Fire Loss or Theft

By: Jack Young

How do we appraise equipment that's been destroyed or stolen? Of course we hope for good records - photos, equipment lists, maintenance records - but rarely are those available. Often whatever records might have existed have been lost in the same fire that destroyed the equipment. In most of the fire cases we've been called into, the underlying problem can be that either that the insurance company doesn't agree with the loss value submitted by the claimant or that nobody can confirm what has actually been lost.


3/9/2016· Appraisal & Valuation

Equipment Appraisals for Ad Valorem Tax Appeals

By: Jack Young

Considering an ad valorem tax appeal for your business? Business owners who provide independent equipment values researched by experienced, qualified equipment appraisers are more successful in their tax appeal. Whether negotiating assessed values with the county property appraiser or in a value adjustment board hearing, a taxpayer who's prepared with a USPAP equipment appraisal review has a better chance of having their assessed values reduced.


11/25/2015· Appraisal & Valuation

Appraisal Review: Determining Whether an Appraisal is Accurate

By: Jack Young

Appraisal review raises the bar on appraisal reports by providing professional, expert review of the appraiser's qualifications, how well the report aligns with standards of appraisal practice, and whether or not the appraisal report itself makes logical sense to a trained professional. Failure of an appraisal report to meet any of these three qualifications indicates that the report under review cannot be depended upon.

; broker Movie Ad
Unicourt Logo Button

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo