banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Minimizing Medicolegal Risk In The COVID And Post-COVID Era

By: Vipul Kella, MD, MBA, FACEP

Tel: 248-703-7998
Email Dr. Kella

View Profile on Experts.com.


The traditional definition of medical malpractice - medical care that falls below the accepted standards of care by “reasonable physicians” will now be scrutinized more than ever during and the years following the COVID19 pandemic. The pandemic placed enormous strain on our health systems: hospitals were operating at maximum capacity, supply shortages were well-publicized, and healthcare providers were scarce and overworked. In light of these challenges, efforts were made on the federal level to minimize fear of legal repercussions given the challenging healthcare environment.

The US Department of Health and Human Services amended the Public Read and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act to offer legal protections to medical providers during COVID to recognize the difficulty of these practice conditions. The Coronavirus Aid Relief And Economic Security (CARES) Act also offered protection against liability for healthcare providers providing volunteer services during the pandemic. These regulations were good news for physicians as they allowed more leeway for trying to deliver care during difficult circumstances that were often out of their direct control. COVID-related lawsuits would be made increasingly difficult to bring forward, and would need to provide evidence of gross negligence, bad faith, intentional harm, or reckless misconduct.

Despite these legal protections, a new legal risk has risen to the forefront. One of the ancillary effects already being felt from the pandemic is the increasing complexity of cases due to patients delaying care for chronic conditions. Patients are increasingly presented for medical care in a much sicker condition or at an advanced stage of their disease due to poor control or missed diagnosis. This is particularly felt in emergency departments, where pent up demand is already leading to a rapid surge in patient volumes with higher acuity. This opens up a new level of risk that providers must now account for.

Providers should be mindful of this consequence, and now pay particular attention to their medical documentation. Missed or delayed screening appointments due to the pandemic or attempts by providers to have patient follow-up for abnormal tests or routine exams should be meticulously documented. As long as good faith efforts are documented, providers can minimize their legal risk and pass the ‘reasonable physician’ standard, even if patients have medical consequences felt from the pandemic.


Vipul Kella, MD, MBA, FACEP is a board-certified Emergency Medicine Physician, who has been practicing for 15 years. He is a Fellow, of the American College of Emergency Physician, and is licensed in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) and Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS). Dr. Kella has served as a medical expert for 10 years. He has reviewed over 100 cases, and spent over 1,000 hours on case reviews and preparing reports. He is dedicated to providing expertise to clients in a variety of areas, including medical malpractice, personal injury, forensics, disability, and others.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

vipul-kella-emergency-medicine-expert-photo.jpg

12/21/2020· Medical Malpractice

Is There Medicolegal Immunity In The COVID19 Era?

By: Vipul Kella, MD, MBA, FACEP

While the vaccines may potentially provide the widespread immunity needed to quell the spread of COVID19, questions remain about the medicolegal immunity medical providers will afford during and well after the pandemic.

Thomas-Berger-Cardiology-Expert-Photo.jpg

1/28/2011· Medical Malpractice

Your Med-Mal Expert – An Advocate for the Truth

By: Thomas J. Berger, MD

In 1998, problems with my vision forced me to retire from the active practice of cardiac surgery.

jeffrey-nicholson-physician-assistant-expert-photo.jpg

11/5/2016· Medical Malpractice

Physician Assistant and Nurse Practitioner Malpractice Trends

By: Dr. Jeffrey Nicholson

Trends in malpractice awards and adverse actions (e.g., revocation of provider license) following an act or omission constituting medical error or negligence were examined. The National Practitioner Data Bank was used to compare rates of malpractice reports and adverse actions for physicians, physician assistants (PAs), and nurse practitioners (NPs). During 2005 through 2014, there ranged from 11.2 to 19.0 malpractice payment reports per 1,000 physicians, 1.4 to 2.4 per 1,000 PAs, and 1.1 to 1.4 per 1,000 NPs. Physician median payments ranged from 1.3 to 2.3 times higher than PAs or NPs. Diagnosis-related malpractice allegations varied by provider type, with physicians having significantly fewer reports (31.9%) than PAs (52.8%) or NPs (40.6%) over the observation period. Trends in malpractice payment reports may reflect policy enactments to decrease liability.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo