banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Case Study: Building Department "Drops The Ball"

By: Mr. Clinton Ford
Tel: 386-462-9144, 866-784-2597, 352 514-1087 (Cell)
Email Mr. Ford


View Profile on Experts.com.


Through a referral from an Architect, a school teacher called Clinton J. Ford P.A. with questions concerning the construction of their new two-story home. After a lengthy conversation the Owners requested that Clinton J. Ford P.A. come to the site and review their architectural plans for compliance.

During the initial inspection and contract document review, Clinton J. Ford P.A. was able to identify numerous deviations from Building Codes, omissions from Architects Plans & Specifications, and errors in the installation of specific manufactured products. In addition, Clinton J. Ford P.A. had to spend several hours with the Owners, proving that the entire second floor had not been constructed in accordance with the Sealed Architectural Plans and Specifications. In addition the Residential Contractor filed a fraudulent FS 713 Construction Lien against the Owners property for non-payment.

The aforementioned discoveries lead to the generation of a detailed report to be used to litigate against the contractor. Thereafter, a site meeting was held with the Building Official from the county building department, the Residential Contractor and the Owners. A two hour recorded statement was taken by Clinton J. Ford P.A. from the Residential Contractor which produced incriminating evidence. The statement was subsequently transcribed for the case to be used as evidence.

After the completion of the recorded statement and the departure of the Residential Contractor, the Building Official voiced his outraged opinion concerning the number of code violations and other adverse problems that were discovered with the building. At the end of the meeting, the Building Official just kept repeating "We Dropped The Ball On This One", knowing all along that his Department was protected by sovereign immunity.

Since the Owner had not retained an attorney, we therefore recommended one who we had a good working relationship with on current cases. Because of the overwhelming evidence gathered through investigation and inspection by Clinton J. Ford P.A. the Residential Contractor finally waived his $75,000 dollar lien in order to dismiss the case.

In conclusion Clinton J. Ford P.A. with the help of the Attorney was able to substantiate the gross defective workmanship and poor legal position that the Residential Contractor was in. The aforementioned brought a quick closure to the dispute and therefore avoided costly litigation. The Attorney benefited by having all the facts that were pertinent to the claim, aid and assistance during the progression of the claim without maintaining expensive staff and overhead and the additional income from the referral.


Clinton J. Ford, MS, CGC, ACA, CIE, has over 24 years of experience as a State Certified General Contractor. He provides consulting support to clients and or attorneys who need assistance during Pre-trial and or Trial, pre or post termination of contractor, investigation of contractor or sub-contractors, licensure issues, permitting issues and or other.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

long-international-logo.jpg

8/13/2013· Construction

Construction Claims For Variation in Quantity

By: Long International

A component of a construction claim often relates to the cost, quantity, and quality of the materials that the contractor installed on a project. The contractor frequently purchases these materials and agrees to install the quantities of materials on a unit price basis, i.e., a unit price that includes both the cost of the materials and the cost to install them.

Sanford-Loy-Construction-Defect-Expert-Photo.jpg

12/14/2022· Construction

Design-Bid-Build, Design-Build Or Construction Management? Circa 2022

By: Sanford C. Loy

Any of these methods can produce beneficial results…but the decision as to which one is used must be made carefully with a full understanding of the pluses and minuses of each; each owner’s circumstances, risk tolerance, staffing, experience with construction, the degree to which the schedule and budget are respectively critical as well a

long-international-logo.jpg

9/27/2013· Construction

Discrete Damages/Cost Variance Analysis Method for Quantifying Damages in Construction Claims

By: Long International

The "discrete damages/cost variance analysis method" for quantifying construction claim damages involves the specific distribution of all costs incurred on the project rather than quantifying only certain parts of the cost or damage analysis as may be used in the other methods.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo
;