banner ad
Experts Logo


Civil Litigation and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

By: Dr. Burt Singerman
Tel: 814-244-1016
Email Dr. Singerman

View Profile on

An ever-increasing number of plaintiffs are claiming post-traumatic stress disorder. Why such a sudden, marked increase in litigation of this form?

Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was first described in the sixth century B.C. The symptoms associated with the illness have not changed, though the name of the condition itself has, naturally, changed. In World War I the disorder was labeled "shell shock," linking the condition to the close lines between battling armies and the continuous firing of munitions. In World War II, the condition came to be called "combat neurosis." The term "post-traumatic stress disorder" entered the psychiatric nomenclature with the 1980 publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition.

The Vietnam conflict heightened the lay public's awareness of this condition, through frequent articles in the press, movies, and books depicting the invisible wounds caused by combat. Symptoms of the disorder include rapid hyperarousal which frequently leads to aggressive acts. These behavioral changes often lead to the loss of family and employment.In addition, associated alcohol and/or drug abuse as selfmedication of the symptoms is frequent. Finally, in severe and usually untreated cases, suicide can occur.

The Iraq and Afghanistan wars have once again brought these combatrelated symptoms to the fore, and nowadays there is more awareness of issues surrounding civilian PTSD. According to studies in civilian populations,accidents causing significant injuries,, medical malpractice disability, or discrimination and the associated harassment are often root causes of the disorder. Rape is the incident most predictive of PTSD.

This increased awareness of PTSD is but one reason for the increase in lawsuits involving the disorder. Additionally, according to studies, those who claim to have PTSD win markedly higher legal settlements. Both of these factors incentivize some individuals to simply learn the symptoms and behaviors associated with PTSD, and act them out-especially when there will likely be a sympathetic group of jurors. Lawyers are increasingly aware of such fraudulent claims, and they now place greater emphasis on the full constellation of symptoms that characterize PTSD.

The newest criteria for diagnosis of PTSD include a severely traumatic event, as well as having flashbacks, dreams, and frequent sleep disturbance related to the event. Patients will also often withdraw from environmental stimuli that remind them of the traumatic event.

In all sufferers of PTSD, there is a marked decrease in functional level. The success of civil litigation involving PTSD often depends on the attitudes of jurors and judges toward this psychiatric disorder. Meanwhile, as the amounts awarded to sufferers of PTSD continue to rise, less-than-honest lawyers have taken to coaching clients in the art of passing as psychologically traumatized.

Disagreement between psychiatric expert witnesses on the defense and plaintiff sides is common. The witness' credentials and experience in working with post-traumatic stress disorder-in both military and civilian populations-frequently determines whether the defense or plaintiff is successful.

Lawyers should always carry out thorough background checks to verify a particular psychiatrist's professional experiences and background in litigation. Deserving clients will be most appreciative.

Burton Singerman, MD, is a nationally respected Psychiatric Expert Witness who established Burton Singerman, MD, LLC to ensure that Mental Health Disability cases are accurately diagnosed and that professional standards of psychiatric care upheld in all clinical settings. Dr. Singerman is a past head of 3 Successful Academic Departments of Psychiatry. He attended Harvard Medical School and Johns Hopkins Hospital Psychiatry Residency Training, and is the recipient of three year National Institute of Mental Health Post Doctoral Research Award at Washington University Medical School. He was also honored to be the Recipient of Exceptional Psychiatrist of the Year Award by the National Alliance of the Mentally Ill.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved


Related articles


3/8/2012· Psychiatry

Facilitation of Mourning During Childhood

By: Dr. Gilbert Kliman

Here you will meet several children helped by Cornerstone who suffered from tragic losses and tragic circumstances. This chapter is essentially practical in its orientation to technique, describing several forms of treatment of bereaved children, with a minimum of theoretical essay. Probably the best definition of "mourning" for our current purposes is, "the totality of reaction to the loss of a loved object."


9/27/2011· Psychiatry

How Child Psychiatric Testimony Works

By: Dr. Gilbert Kliman

The legal system and juries customarily weigh evidence more regularly than the psychoanalytic profession.


12/3/2014· Psychiatry

Direct Examination And Cross Examination of The Expert Witness: Psychiatrists And Psychologists

By: Dr. Stephen M. Raffle

In order for a medical opinion to be admissible as evidence in civil, criminal and administrative cases, the basis of the opinion must fulfill either the Daubert Criteria or the Frye test, depending on the jurisdiction. The judge of the court rules on the admissibility of the expert opinion. The effect of Daubert has been to limit expert testimony to opinions which are based on a scientific foundation. Daubert specifies that adequate scientific support and method and a known error rate must exist. The testimony of a mental health expert rendering an opinion using criteria which does not meet Daubert standards is weakened by the implication that it is not based on "sound science." In some instances, for example, a mental health expert uses an approach where there are no peer-reviewed studies or methods, such as when psychologists compose their own neuropsychological test batteries. In most cases where an attorney is considering a "Daubert challenge," a contemporaneous and up-to-date literature search is indicated. Also, extensive case law presently exists as to specific issues. Being familiar with the Daubert criteria enhances effectiveness in challenging a mental health expert's opinion, whether on voir dire or cross examination. On direct examination, the strengths of an opinion reached under Daubert criteria become a "teaching moment" for the trier of fact, because it will be founded on the science of mental health assessment.

; broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo