banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Frederick Fisher - Professional Liability Insurance Expert

Continuity And Prior/Pending Litigation Exclusions In The Claims-Made Policy Form

As originally published by IRMI, 2014.

By: Frederick Fisher
Tel: 310-413-6200
Email Mr. Fisher

View Profile on Experts.com.


The 35-year history of the claims-made policy form has not brought it stability or standardization. In fact, claims-made forms have begun to incorporate with increasing frequency additional and exclusionary language that is unfavorable to the policyholder.

The current claims-made form is used for both professional liability (errors and omissions) and directors and officers (D&O) liability policies (in addition to others). This version of the policy evolved from two different "tracks" that are now converging with subtle yet dangerous results for insureds as well as for those who sell these forms.

Evolution of Claims-Made Provisions in D&O Forms

Directors and officers liability policies have long been issued on a "pure claims-made" basis (a phrase this writer first coined in 1990). That is, they were written with no prior act date (also known as a retroactive date). As a result, wrongful acts of the directors and officers dating back to corporate formation were covered as long as the claim was first made against the insured during the policy term. To minimize the singular risk D&O insurers were taking (i.e., "what probability exists that a claim will be first made against the insured during the policy term?"), they began using a "continuity date" and/or a "prior/pending litigation exclusionary" date that was the same as the inception date of the first policy issued. The date the insured first obtained coverage thus became known as the "first coverage date" so the "continuity date" could be honored at renewal. This was reinforced by a warranty within the application for coverage stating that the insured was or was not aware of facts, incidents, or circumstances that could give rise to a claim in the future.

Renewal applications did not contain such warranties so as not to "break the chain of continuity," even after several years. The continuity date would often be "backdated" to the "first coverage date." Given policy language changes requiring claims be reported to the insurer during the policy term, one does have trouble reconciling the lack of a warranty statement on renewal with the requirement that claims be reported during the policy term. Solving the problem that arises if a known claim is "reported" after renewal with the chain of continuity dating back to the original application of years ago is also a problem. Worse, perhaps, was if the insured elected to move to another insurer that was willing to accept a renewal application without warranties so as not to break the chain of continuity. Simply stated, this appears absurd, given that many such policies do not define the term "continuity date" other than being the "continuity date" that appears on the declarations page!

The Continuity Date

. . .Continue to read rest of article (PDF).


Frederick J. Fisher, JD, is the President of Fisher Consulting Group, Inc., a Professional Liability firm. Since his career began, Mr. Fisher focused on one vision: providing financial security to the client. The result was a successful 40 year career in Specialty Lines Insurance.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

David-Haass-Health-Insurance-Expert-Photo.jpg

12/11/2019· Insurance

New Medicare Advantage Long Term Care (LTC) Benefits Are On The Way

By: David Haass

New Medicare Advantage Long Term Care (LTC) benefits are on the way. LTC financing has become a crisis in America. With rising costs, increasing demand, and few resources to help pay for care, seniors and families are feeling the strain.

Guy-Hatfield-Insurance-Management-Expert-Photo.jpg

8/28/2017· Insurance

The Expert Dilemma

By: Guy C. Hatfield

I have been active as an insurance agent/broker for 40 years. 20 years ago I was referred to an attorney by a fellow CPCU colleague to be a so called "expert". The case involved an agent who failed to provide workers compensation benefits to an ongoing commercial concern. I was hired by the plaintiff's attorney to opine on the conduct of the agent. Since this was a fundamental error on the part of the agent, the case was soon settled in favor of the plaintiff. This was my introduction to being an expert. I found I enjoyed the experience and it was a nice contrast to sales and insurance administration.

EFI-Logo.gif

8/7/2013· Insurance

Investigating Water Loss Origins

By: EFI Global - Mark E. Goldman and Stacey O'Rourke

Water damage is costly to both homeowners and insurance companies. It is estimated that the cost of household water damage in California, alone, exceeded $500 million for 2002. While the number of water-related claims varies year to year, the average amount paid for such claims increased steadily from $2,577 in 1988 to $3,646 in 2002.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad
Unicourt Logo Button

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo