Your browser is currently set to block JavaScript.

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.

After enabling javascript, please refresh the page to go back to experts.com site with full functionality

Would you turn off/on JavaScript?

It's a widely used language that makes the web what it is today, allowing for websites to be more responsive, dynamic, and interactive. Disabling JavaScript takes websites back to a time when they were simple documents without any other features.

What are the advantages of using JavaScript?

Speed. Since JavaScript is an 'interpreted' language, it reduces the time required by other programming languages like Java for compilation. JavaScript is also a client-side script, speeding up the execution of the program as it saves the time required to connect to the server.

banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Hernia Mesh Complications Expert Witness: Challenges And Potential Issues In Hernia Mesh Litigation

By: Dr. Kent Sasse, MD,MPH, FACS, FASCRS, FASMBS
Email Dr. Sasse
Telephone: 707-597-2999


View Profile on Experts.com.


Mesh is used to support the tissues in most hernia repairs in the U.S. This practice stems from research showing that without reinforcement material, hernias tend to recur frequently over the long term when the repairs are performed using suture repairs alone. Surgical mesh, made from polypropylene and similar materials formed into screens, was designed to add a supportive layer and reduce the rate of recurrence of hernias.  And, broadly speaking, inguinal, ventral, and incisional hernia repairs with mesh do recur less often and have less problems than those historical comparisons using suture repair alone.

But hernia repair is a surgical procedure with potential complications, and the mesh material may play a role in some types of complications, such as erosion, sepsis, mesh contracture, and other phenomena. When litigation arises after such complications, an expert witness is called upon to identify the root cause of the complications and determine whether a breach of standard of care has occurred. The hernia surgeon expert witness is called upon to testify on standard of care, determine if there was a breach of standard of care, and assess causation of damages. One of the primary issues for the bariatric surgery expert witness is determining whether complications suffered were a result of a breach of the applicable standard of care.

Hernia repair is performed with a wide variety of techniques today, including open repairs, laparoscopic repairs and robotic repairs. In some cases, the technique of repair may be the subject of discussion at trial. Additionally, the mesh graft products exhibit different characteristics and properties, and some have been recalled. If you are wondering about a particular type of mesh and whether it has been subject to a recall, you can check the FDA website here: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfRES/res.cfm.

Like all medical procedures, hernia repair surgery with mesh may result in complications and allegations of product defect or medical malpractice against the treating providers and the facility. In such lawsuits the parties may find an experienced hernia surgeon expert witness valuable to assist the trier of fact in fully understanding the evidence in the case.


Dr. Kent Sasse, MD,MPH, FACS, FASCRS, FASMBS, is a Bariatric surgery thought leader. He has performed over 5,000 primary bariatric surgical procedures and 500 revisional bariatric procedures. He is a Medical Director of a nationally accredited bariatric surgery center and an award-winning teacher. Dr. Sasse is a widely published scientist and author of nine books as well as an inventor and patent holder of a bariatric surgical device. His clinical experience includes bariatric surgery and endoscopy, sleeve gastrectomy, gastric bypass, duodenal switch, reoperative surgery, revisional surgery, hiatal hernia, wound care, Barrett's esophagus, hernia mesh, hernia mesh explantation, endoscopic stenting, leaks, Ambulatory Surgery Centers, and solving complications.  Dr. Sasse is a prolific public speaker and he serves on the University of Nevada School of Medicine faculty. He is an experienced expert witness at both deposition and trial. Dr. Sasse can be contacted at 707.597.2999 or drsasse@sassesurgical.com.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

Paul-Hofmann-Hospital-Administration-Expert-Photo.jpg

3/19/2020· Medical Malpractice

Revisiting the Executive's Role In Malpractice Cases: Reducing the Incidence of Medical Malpractice

By: Paul B. Hofmann, DrPH, FACHE

Although there are still too many instances when clinical mistakes are denied, timely disclosures and apologies are not made, results of investigations are not shared and compensation offers are not extended, more hospitals are taking a less adversarial position.

Kent-Sasse-Bariatric-Expert-Photo.jpg

4/26/2022· Medical Malpractice

Bariatric Surgery And Endoscopy Expert Witness: Providing A Valuable Service An Medical Malpractice Litigation

By: Dr. Kent Sasse

Metabolic and Bariatric surgery and endoscopy play increasingly important roles in the treatment of type two diabetes and obesity. American Diabetes Association and other societal guidelines now incorporate sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass into their recommended treatment protocols.

jeffrey-nicholson-physician-assistant-expert-photo.jpg

11/5/2016· Medical Malpractice

Physician Assistant and Nurse Practitioner Malpractice Trends

By: Dr. Jeffrey Nicholson

Trends in malpractice awards and adverse actions (e.g., revocation of provider license) following an act or omission constituting medical error or negligence were examined. The National Practitioner Data Bank was used to compare rates of malpractice reports and adverse actions for physicians, physician assistants (PAs), and nurse practitioners (NPs). During 2005 through 2014, there ranged from 11.2 to 19.0 malpractice payment reports per 1,000 physicians, 1.4 to 2.4 per 1,000 PAs, and 1.1 to 1.4 per 1,000 NPs. Physician median payments ranged from 1.3 to 2.3 times higher than PAs or NPs. Diagnosis-related malpractice allegations varied by provider type, with physicians having significantly fewer reports (31.9%) than PAs (52.8%) or NPs (40.6%) over the observation period. Trends in malpractice payment reports may reflect policy enactments to decrease liability.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo
;