Does the availability of weapons lead to violence? Citizens certainly have a right to bear arms and defend themselves. However, what does the science say about this area?
The criminal justice system in California has undergone several reforms over the past decade. As part of these reforms, there has been more emphasis on providing care and treatment to defendants with mental illness rather than incarcerating them in jail or prison.
In 2018, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law Senate Bill 215, which created a pre-trial diversion program for defendants with a mental disorder that has been accused of committing specific crimes. If they successfully complete treatment, the criminal charges will be dismissed and the record of the arrest will be sealed.
The goal of this blog post is to provide an overview of the guidelines regarding mental health diversion (PC 1001.36) and how we evaluate individuals to determine if they meet the criteria for pre-trial diversion.
In order to qualify for mental health diversion, there are several requirements that have to be met. A defendant that is charged with either a felony or misdemeanor would be able to qualify; however, there are certain crimes that are not eligible for mental health diversion.
PC 1001.36 states that the following crimes are not eligible for diversion:
PC 1001.36 also outlines the mental disorders that would qualify for mental health diversion. The defendant must suffer from a mental disorder as specified in the most recent edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM). Any diagnosis can qualify except for the ones that are prohibited by statute, which include the following:
While any mental health condition that is listed in the DSM (except the three listed above) can qualify for mental health diversion, some of the most common conditions include:
PC 1001.36 states that the court may grant mental health diversion, for a period no longer than 2 years, to a defendant if they meet the following criteria:
PC 1001.36 requires that the defendant be evaluated by a qualified mental health professional. This will either be a forensic psychologist or psychiatrist that has the experience and training necessary to answer these questions for the court.
The mental health expert is retained by the defense attorney to complete the evaluation and provide the report to the attorney so they can present it to the court. A comprehensive evaluation is important because it will help the court in its decision-making process. A poorly written report will likely cause the prosecutor to object to the request and the court will likely deny your request for mental health diversion.
A typical evaluation will usually include the following to help answer these questions for the court:
This is an important decision because the defendant is going to be allowed to be in the mental health diversion program for up to two years. This means that they will be in the community rather than in jail or prison. The court does not want to risk having the defendant in the community if they will pose a high risk of danger or violence to the public.
The court uses its discretion and considers the following when making this determination:
As part of our evaluation, we will also complete a violence risk assessment using a structured professional judgment tool (SPJ) like the Historical, Clinical, Risk-20 (HCR-20). This is important because the court will also review the mental health expert’s report and opinion when considering if the defendant poses a risk of danger to the community.
Various risk and protective factors are taken into consideration to provide a risk formulation (low, moderate, or high) regarding future violence risk, the risk for serious physical harm, and the risk for imminent violence. We have a detailed blog post that goes over how violence risk assessments are completed in criminal cases.
The risk formulation will identify the situations where they have become violent in the past and the circumstances that potentially caused violent behavior. The formulation will also identify ways to help mitigate violence risk.
For example, a recommendation to help lower violence risk might be to refer the defendant to an inpatient treatment facility as part of their mental health diversion program rather than outpatient treatment.
The defendant would spend several weeks in the treatment facility where their medication compliance can be closely monitored and supervised. If there is a co-occurring history of substance use, the program can also help them detox and stay sober. Based on their progress in the inpatient treatment program, they can then be referred to a partial hospitalization program then eventually to outpatient treatment.
If the court grants mental health diversion, the defendant is referred to a diversion program that cannot take more than two years. The two-year rule is based on PC 1001.36.
The treatment program can consist of either inpatient or outpatient treatment and if needed, can also include alcohol or drug treatment. The court needs to be satisfied that the recommended inpatient or outpatient program will meet the specialized mental health treatment needs of the defendant.
The treatment program can be paid for by either private or public funds. If the defendant cannot afford to pay for treatment, the court can refer them to the county mental health department. The treatment program must be willing to provide regular reports to the court, the defense, and the prosecutor on the defendant’s progress in treatment.
If the defendant does not comply with the treatment program the mental health diversion program can be terminated and criminal proceedings would be reinstated.
Additional situations that can result in the reinstatement of criminal proceedings include:
If the defendant is able to complete the treatment program, the court will dismiss the charges. The court may conclude that the defendant has performed satisfactorily if the defendant has:
After the mental health diversion program is completed, the arrest related to the original charges will be sealed and destroyed. It will be as if the arrest and prosecution never happened. The arrest cannot be used to deny the defendant any employment, benefit, license, or certificate.
There are several exceptions when sealed arrest records and records of successful participation in the diversion program can be used:
Mental health diversion allows defendants with a mental disorder that have been accused of committing specific crimes to receive treatment rather than go to jail or prison.
A qualified mental health expert, such as a forensic psychologist or psychiatrist, will complete an evaluation to help the court determine mental health diversion should grant diversion.
In order to be granted mental health diversion, the defendant has to meet the following criteria:
If the defendant meets these criteria and the court agrees to grant diversion, the defendant will be referred to a treatment program that cannot be longer than two years. If the defendant successfully completes the program, the arrest related to the original charges will be sealed and destroyed.
The laws regarding mental health diversion can be complicated and confusing. We’re hoping that this overview helped you understand how we evaluate a defendant to determine if they meet the legal criteria for mental health diversion.
Dr. Emin Gharibian, PsyD is a Clinical Psychologist specializing in Neuropsychology with over 10 years of experience in assessing, treating, and consulting on psychological disorders. He specializes in providing comprehensive psychological and neuropsychological evaluations for a variety of conditions including dementia, Alzheimer.s disease, complications from a stroke, traumatic brain injury, concussions, learning disabilities, ADHD, and PTSD in clinical, civil, and criminal cases.
©Copyright - All Rights Reserved
DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.
By: Dr. James Zender
A powerful adjunct to post-trauma psychotherapy is body-oriented therapies and methods. Yoga, massage therapy, and Pilates are powerful tools that should be considered and included in the comprehensive treatment plan. In my work with auto accident trauma survivors I daily see the value of combining massage therapy and methods such as Pilates with the verbal working through of trauma in psychotherapy. I believe auto insurance carriers would earn big returns on their investments by paying for personal trainers to work with survivors in regular Pilates sessions which somatically supports the psycho-therapeutic work. When combined with regular massage therapy, the synergy of the combined approaches is the perfect combination for many people attempting to gain improved emotional regulation, physical health, and mobility.
In today's world, anger management has become a necessary concept to understand and practice in order to effectively navigate the challenges of family, work, school and social life. It is commonly thought that managing angerinvolves not getting angry anymore.