banner ad
Experts Logo


Peritraumatic Reactions and Post traumatic Stress Disorder in Psychiatrically Impaired Youth

As Originally published in Journal of Traumatic Stress, February 2012.

By: Dr. Jeffrey Sugar & Julian D. Ford
Tel: 310-291-0886
Email Dr. Sugar

View Profile on

Although peritraumatic dissociation and other subjective peritraumatic reactions, such as emotional distress and arousal, have been shown to affect the relationship between a traumatic event and the development of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in adults, systematic studies with youth have not been done. In a mixed ethnic and racial sample of 90 psychiatrically impaired youth (ages 10-18, 56% boys), we investigated the contributions of peritraumatic dissociation, emotional distress, and arousal to current PTSD severity after accounting for the effects of gender, trauma history, trait dissociation, and psychopathology (attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and depression). Peritraumatic dissociation emerged as the only peritraumatic variable associated with current PTSD severity assessed both by questionnaire and interview methods (ß = .30 and .47 p < .01). Peritraumatic dissociation can be rapidly assessed in clinical practice and warrants further testing in prospective studies as a potential mediator of the trauma-PTSD relationship in youth.

Psychological trauma and clinically significant posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms are prevalent among children in community samples (Copeland, Keeler, Angold, & Costello, 2007; Costello, Erkanli, Fairbank, & Angold, 2002) and children with psychiatric disorders (Mueser & Taub, 2008). Empirically validated risk moderators for PTSD in youth include female gender, exposure to abuse or interpersonal violence, physical injury, caregiver exposure to threat and distress, and diminished protective factors before and after traumatic exposure (Brom, Pat-Horenczyk, & Ford, 2008; Fairbank, Putnam, & Harris, 2007).

Peritraumatic reactions, including dissociation, have predicted PTSD in adult studies (Breh & Seidler, 2007; Lensvelt-Mulders et al., 2008; Ozer, Best, Lipsey,&Weiss, 2003), and studies with healthy children have found peritraumatic dissociation to predict PTSD following serious accidents (Schafer, Barkmann, Riedesser, & Schulte- Markwort, 2004), terrorism (Pfefferbaum et al., 2002), and injury-related hospitalization (Bui et al., 2010; Daviss et al., 2000; Kassam-Adams & Winston, 2004). Peritraumatic dissociation, however, has not been studied with psychiatrically impaired children. Therefore, the present study examined the relationship between peritraumatic reactions and PTSD in a sample of psychiatrically impaired youth.

Peritraumatic dissociation is the most extensively studied peritraumatic reaction in adults, defined as "alterations in perception of time, place, and person, which reflect a sense of unreality," during or immediately following a traumatic event (Zoellner, Alvarez-Conrad, & Foa, 2002, p. 49). Peritraumatic dissociation involves a range of reactions from confusion, disorientation, or emotional shock to loss of reality orientation and fragmentation of consciousness and self (Lensvelt-Mulders et al., 2008). Peritraumatic dissociation is conceived as a mental state occurring close to a traumatic event, then diminishing, while trait dissociation is conceptualized as a stable and persistent disruption of normally integrated experience (Spitzer et al., 2006). Although distinct constructs, peritraumatic and trait dissociation may be correlated (Giesbrecht, Smeets, & Merckelbach, 2008). Although peritraumatic dissociation has been described as an epiphenomenon of trait dissociation (Lensvelt-Mulders et al., 2008), even if correlated, trait and peritraumatic dissociation may each independently contribute to PTSD. Trait dissociation assessed in preservice law enforcement training predicted both subsequent peritraumatic dissociation and PTSD severity, but after accounting for prior trauma history, peritraumatic dissociation independently predicted PTSD severity (McCaslin et al., 2008). A study in an adult community sample added the concept of "ongoing dissociation" to describe dissociation that begins peritraumatically and persists, and did not find a primary role for peritraumatic dissociation alone (Briere, Scott, & Weathers, 2005).

Prospective studies with adults have not always supported peritraumatic dissociation as a predictor of PTSD severity (van der Velden & Wittmann, 2008). Similarly, a prospective study of hospitalized injured children found that although severity of peritraumatic emotional distress and prior traumatization and psychopathology predicted posthospitalization PTSD, peritraumatic dissociation did not (Daviss et al., 2000). In another prospective study of hospitalized injured children, both peritraumatic arousal and dissociation predicted PTSD, but neither low peritraumatic arousal nor low peritraumatic dissociation identified children who did not develop PTSD; that is, they had low specificity (Kassam-Adams & Winston, 2004). Peritraumatic dissociation has been shown to correlate with other peritraumatic responses, including peritraumatic emotional distress (Fikretoglu et al., 2006; Marmar, Weiss, & Metzler, 1998) and arousal (Fikretoglu et al., 2007; Sterlini & Bryant, 2002). Dyb et al. (2008) found peritraumatic dissociation, arousal, and emotional distress scores in traumatized adolescents were intercorrelated and each strongly correlated with current PTSD severity. Peritraumatic dissociation and emotional distress were the strongest unique correlates of PTSD severity. In studies with adult accident and terrorism survivors, peritraumatic dissociation, arousal (assessed by elevated heart rate), and initial PTSD severity were independent prospective predictors of PTSD severity (Shalev & Freedman, 2005; Shalev, Peri, Canetti, & Schreiber, 1996). Prospective studies of law enforcement personnel (McCaslin et al., 2008) and industrial disaster survivors (Birmes, Daubisse, & Brunet, 2008) have shown that peritraumatic dissociation and independently predict subsequent PTSD severity. Therefore, in addition to assessing peritraumatic dissociation's relationship to PTSD, it is important to examine effects of peritraumatic arousal and emotional distress.

Moreover, other factors, both pre- and posttraumatic, including psychopathology, trait dissociation, and prior trauma exposure (Ozer, Best, Lipsey, &Weiss, 2008) have consistently correlated with subsequent PTSD severity, and thus may account for much of the observed relationship between peritraumatic dissociation and PTSD (Ozer et al., 2008; van der Velden & Wittmann, 2008). In addition to the internalizing disorders commonly identified in studies of childhood peritraumatic dissociation and PTSD, externalizing disorders (Ford & Connor, 2009; Ford et al., 2000) and severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., bipolar disorder, psychosis; Mueser&Taub, 2008) are also either highly comorbid with PTSD or associated with PTSD severity in children.

Childhood sexual abuse is the trauma exposure most consistently associated both with child psychopathology (Mueser&Taub, 2008) and with trait dissociation in adults (Briere & Elliott, 2003), adolescents (Plattner et al., 2003), and children (Putnam, Helmers, & Trickett, 1993). Retrospectively recalled childhood peritraumatic dissociation was associated with risk of adult sexual and physical victimization and PTSD severity, and peritraumatic dissociation was the unique correlate of PTSD severity, depression, and dissociative symptoms among women survivors of childhood sexual abuse (Johnson, Pike, & Chard, 2001). Peritraumatic dissociation in sexually abused girls was related to self-harm and sexual revictimization 9 years later (Noll, Horowitz, Bonanno, Trickett, & Putnam, 2003). Sexual abuse victims report elevations of both trait and peritraumatic dissociation (Noll et al., 2003; Putnam, 2003). Physical abuse is less consistently associated with dissociative symptomatology, but physically abused children (Pelcovitz et al., 1994) and chronically ill adults with histories of childhood physical abuse (Spinhoven et al., 2004) reported elevated trait dissociation. Parental emotional abuse in childhood has been equally-or more strongly-associated with trait dissociation in young adults than either physical or sexual abuse (Teicher, Samson, Polcari, & McGreenery, 2006). Despite these strong associations with trait dissociation, after accounting for physical and sexual abuse, peritraumatic dissociation in a sample of college women remained associated with PTSD severity (Hetzel & McCanne, 2005).

In addition to abuse, childhood exposure to other traumatic stressors is associated with psychopathology including PTSD. Witnessing domestic (Teicher et al., 2006) or community violence (McKelvey et al., 2011), and exposure to traumatic accidents (Schafer, Barkmann, Riedesser, & Schulte-Markwort, 2006) are associated with PTSD. Therefore, these additional exposures were included in this study.

Female gender is consistently associated both with peritraumatic dissociation severity and prevalence in adults (Olff, Langeland, Draijer, & Gersons, 2007; Seedat, Stein, & Carey, 2005). Among children, girls report more severe peritraumatic dissociation (Dyb et al., 2008; van der Velden & Wittmann, 2008) and more prevalent and severe PTSD (Copeland et al., 2007) than boys. Gender may also influence the moderating effect of family conflict on the relationship between community violence exposure and child psychopathology (McKelvey et al., 2011).

Taken together, the literature suggests that peritraumatic dissociation and other peritraumatic reactions may be associated with subsequent PTSD, but studies need to examine all peritraumatic reactions simultaneously and account for effects of gender, trauma history, trait dissociation, and psychopathology. Although there is good support for a correlation between peritraumatic dissociation and PTSD in children, the specific predictive power of peritraumatic dissociation remains uncertain. Based on this review of variables associated with PTSD, we tested the hypothesis that peritraumatic dissociation will be associated with PTSD severity among psychiatrically impaired children after accounting for effects of gender, trauma history, trait dissociation, psychopathology, and other peritraumatic reactions. To determine if these relationships were robust across measurement methods, PTSD symptom severity was assessed separately by interview and questionnaire measures.


. . .Continue to read rest of article (PDF).

Jeffrey A. Sugar, MD has been a practicing Psychiatrist for over 20 years. Dr. Sugar is board certified both in Child and General Psychiatry. He is Past President of the Southern California Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. He is an Assistant Professor of Clinical Psychiatry at USC, and has been an Assistant Clinical Professor of Psychiatry at UCLA.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved


Related articles


7/11/2017· Psychiatry

Civil Litigation and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

By: Dr. Burt Singerman

An ever-increasing number of plaintiffs are claiming post-traumatic stress disorder. Why such a sudden, marked increase in litigation of this form? Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) was first described in the sixth century B.C. The symptoms associated with the illness have not changed, though the name of the condition itself has, naturally, changed. In World War I the disorder was labeled "shell shock," linking the condition to the close lines between battling armies and the continuous firing of munitions. In World War II, the condition came to be called "combat neurosis." The term "post-traumatic stress disorder" entered the psychiatric nomenclature with the 1980 publication of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Edition.


12/3/2014· Psychiatry

Direct Examination And Cross Examination of The Expert Witness: Psychiatrists And Psychologists

By: Dr. Stephen M. Raffle

In order for a medical opinion to be admissible as evidence in civil, criminal and administrative cases, the basis of the opinion must fulfill either the Daubert Criteria or the Frye test, depending on the jurisdiction. The judge of the court rules on the admissibility of the expert opinion. The effect of Daubert has been to limit expert testimony to opinions which are based on a scientific foundation. Daubert specifies that adequate scientific support and method and a known error rate must exist. The testimony of a mental health expert rendering an opinion using criteria which does not meet Daubert standards is weakened by the implication that it is not based on "sound science." In some instances, for example, a mental health expert uses an approach where there are no peer-reviewed studies or methods, such as when psychologists compose their own neuropsychological test batteries. In most cases where an attorney is considering a "Daubert challenge," a contemporaneous and up-to-date literature search is indicated. Also, extensive case law presently exists as to specific issues. Being familiar with the Daubert criteria enhances effectiveness in challenging a mental health expert's opinion, whether on voir dire or cross examination. On direct examination, the strengths of an opinion reached under Daubert criteria become a "teaching moment" for the trier of fact, because it will be founded on the science of mental health assessment.


2/11/2014· Psychiatry

Assessing Emotional Distress

By: Dr. Stephen M. Raffle

The medical expert cannot express an opinion about the ultimate question to the trier of fact: how much is the plaintiff's emotional distress (emotional injury) worth in dollars? Yet when the question of these monetary damages is put to a jury, their deliberations are better-served if considered in the context of a Forensic Psychiatrist's knowledgeable findings and testimony.

; broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo