Your browser is currently set to block JavaScript.

For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser.

After enabling javascript, please refresh the page to go back to site with full functionality

Would you turn off/on JavaScript?

It's a widely used language that makes the web what it is today, allowing for websites to be more responsive, dynamic, and interactive. Disabling JavaScript takes websites back to a time when they were simple documents without any other features.

What are the advantages of using JavaScript?

Speed. Since JavaScript is an 'interpreted' language, it reduces the time required by other programming languages like Java for compilation. JavaScript is also a client-side script, speeding up the execution of the program as it saves the time required to connect to the server.

banner ad
Experts Logo


Should Cellphones Have Warning Labels?
The Goldhaber Warnings Report Vol II, January 2010

By: Gerald M. Goldhaber, Ph.D.
President & CEO GRA LLC

Office: (212)379-6661
Cell: (917)279-2303
Email Dr. Gerald Goldhaber

View Profile on

View PDF version of the Goldhaber Warnings Report

On January 2, of this year, The New York Times published an article about the possibility of heavy cellphone use being linked to brain cancer. Since approximately 280 million people use cellphones in the United States, including almost 85% of all teens in America, The Goldhaber Warnings Report believes that a summary of the New York Times article would be very helpful to our readers.

During the coming month, the State of Maine will take up the question of whether cellphones sold in Maine should contain warning labels that they may cause brain cancer. According to the New York Times, the mayor of San Francisco, Gavin Newsom, plans to introduce an amendment this year requiring that cellphone packages in San Francisco display the amount of radiation a phone emits. Some countries, including France and India, already recommend limiting exposure to cellphone radiation.

While the politicians debate this issue, it might be helpful to review some of the research that has been published over the last several years. The National Cancer Institute claims that studies have not shown any consistent link between cellular telephone use and cancer, but adds that more research is needed before any firm conclusions can be drawn. A 2005 World Health Organization study found no convincing evidence of an increased cancer risk from cellphones, however, the London Daily Telegraph last October published what they called a sneak preview of a more recent W.H.O. study which will conclude that people who have used their cellphones for over ten years were at an increased risk of developing brain cancer.

Naturally, the response from the cellphone industry has been that cellphone use is safe, and they claim that the peerreviewed literature overwhelmingly indicates such. Further, the FCC supports the industry's position that the available research does not support a link to cancer.

Are we today, with regards to potential harms associated with cellphones, at the same place we were as a nation in the late 1940's and 1950's when early claims of the dangers of smoking were first published? Until further research is available that has taken into account long-term cellphone use, especially with the newer devices and smartphones, you may want to err on the side of caution and use a hands-free or speaker phone cellular device.

Feel free to pass this newsletter on to any of your friends and colleagues .

Dr. Gerald M. Goldhaber, the president of Goldhaber Research Associates, LLC, is a nationally recognized expert in the fields of political polling and warning label research. His clients include Fortune 500 companies, as well as educational and governmental organizations. He has conducted hundreds of surveys, including political polls for candidates running for U.S Congress, Senate, and President. Dr. Goldhaber also served as a consultant to President Reagan's Private Sector Survey for Cost Control.

Dr. Goldhaber has written and edited 10 books and is a frequent international lecturer on the topic of communication. He writes numerous articles on a variety of issues for publication in journals and newspapers across the country, and has served as a political analyst for numerous radio and television shows. He has been selected as a member of Who's Who in America and Who's Who in the World.

See Dr. Gerald Goldhaber's Profile on

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved


Related articles


6/19/2009· Warnings & Labels

Samples of Effective Product Warnings

By: Dr. Gerald Goldhaber

The Goldhaber Warnings Report: In the last issue of this newsletter, I listed the major components found in most warnings along with making several suggestions that should help improve a warning’s conspicuousness and make it more likely to gain the attention of the product’s user at the time of use. The following is an example of a warning that


3/6/2014· Warnings & Labels

Should Energy Drinks Have Warning Labels?

By: Dr. Gerald M. Goldhaber

Earlier this month, the New York Times reported that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had received claims that the drink 5-Hour Energy may have led to 13 deaths and 33 hospitalizations in the last four years. 5-Hour Energy is a highly caffeinated energy shot sold by Michigan-based Living Essentials (a unit of Innovation Ventures) in 2-ounce packages equivalent to drinking about two cups of coffee.


7/23/2013· Warnings & Labels

Forensic Clues: Product Hazard Warnings

By: John Ryan, BSME, PE

Warning labels are an indelible part of our society. Warning labels are everywhere - on our food, on our drinks, on our sweeteners, on our cars, on our tools, on our cigarettes. As consumers we are constantly barraged with multitudes of warnings, cautions, don't do this's, don't do that's.

; broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo