banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

September 2004

Contemporary Skin
Barrier Wall Design And Water Leakage

As similarly published in The Construction Specifier

By: Kimball J. Beasley
Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc.
T: (800) 345-3199
Email: Email Wiss Janney
Website: www.wje.com
Profile on Experts.com.


For hundreds of years, building walls were constructed of stone or brick and were sometimes several feet thick. Such massive walls served well not only to sup port the floors and roof but also to keep out the weather.

In the early twentieth century, economic pressures and the need for taller buildings led to the design of a structural building frame and thinner walls. Such walls required a radical change in water leakage resistance design.

Early traditional masonry barrier walls control water leakage by absorbing water that penetrates the exposed surface and slowly dispersing it as water vapor (see figure). This outward flow of moisture is driven by vapor pressure related to the thermal gradient across the wall. (The interior wall surface is usually warmer than the exposed wall surface.)

In the 1950s, cavity walls came into existence. Cavity walls control water leakage via a continuous air space in the wall that channels water to where it can be diverted outside by internal flashings and weep holes. Since both barrier and cavity wall systems are designed to control water that enters the wall, a limited amount of imperfections in the wall's exposed surface is tolerable.

The skin barrier wall system has evolved over me put 20 years or so This new wall system must deflect all water at the surface to avoid leakage. Any breach in the wall's surface allows uncontrolled water entry to the wall system and building interior. Continuous watertight integrity of both the skin material and elastomeric joint sealants is essential.

Variations of Skin Barrier Walls
Several different types of wall systems fit the skin barrier category. One common type is a thin composite wall panel constructed with a cementitious backer board and faced with thin stone or ceramic tiles. The skin, which is usually about 25 mm (1 in.) thick, is prefabricated or field applied to a light-gage steel stud framing system (figure omitted).

Another popular skin barrier wall system involves a thin (about 1.5 mm[1/16 in .] thick) polymer-based skin material that is trowel-applied to a rigid insulation board and reinforced with a woven glass fiber mesh. Other skin barrier wall systems have skins of metal or glass panels, ceramic plates, or fiber-reinforced concrete.

Water Penetration
The consequences of water penetration through the surface of properly constructed traditional barrier and cavity masonry walls is seldom disastrous. Sealant failure or minor cracks in cavity walls result in more water entry to the cavity but not always leakage to the interior. Sustained water penetration through skin barrier walls, however, almost always leads to water-damaged wall framing, interior finishes, wet insulation, and even mold growth inside the walls.

Design and Maintenance Considerations
Many wall elements require maintenance. Mortar joints in conventional masonry walls require tuckpointing . In any wall system, sealant in joints around windows, expansion joints, and other moving wall joints must be replaced periodically. Since the skin barrier wall's surface is the only line of defense against leaks, maintaining the sealant joints and controlling water entry from other sources (copings, roof flashings, etc.) is critical.

Since skin barrier walls are economical and popular, they are likely here to stay. And with special design attention and proper maintenance, they may perform reasonably well. However, to avoid costly failures, designers and owners must fully understand the lack of leakage control redundancy and heightened maintenance requirements with this wall system.

For a copy of this article and others, please contact WJE.


Kimball J. Beasley is a structural engineer and senior consultant with the Princeton office of Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. Over the past 25 years he has investigated failures and problems of almost 1,000 buildings and structures.

See Wiss Janney's Profile on Experts.com.

©Copyright 2004 - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

thomas_read_photo.jpg

10/24/2022· Failure Analysis

Titanium Surgical Screws Failure Analysis

By: Dr. Thomas Read

Read Consulting Failure Analysis Laboratory was engaged to determine the cause of failure of two titanium surgical screws used in corrective back surgery. These were both 6.5 mm diameter, 40mm long screws that were surgically implanted. in a patient, and they subsequently failed.

thomas_read_photo.jpg

12/20/2023· Failure Analysis

Soda Bottle Failure Analysis

By: Dr. Thomas Read

California materials failure laboratory, Read Consulting Failure Analysis Laboratory was engaged to determine the cause of failure of a 12 oz soda bottle. This bottle was said to have exploded and caused injury to a person. The bottle was said to have spontaneously exploded as the was being pushed into a cooler filled with ice.

jose-villalobos-wastewater-forensic-engineering-expert-photo.jpg

4/5/2024· Failure Analysis

Defending Assets: A Legal Perspective On Corrosion Prevention

By: Jose Villalobos, PE

Corrosion poses a significant threat to various industries, and its impact on assets cannot be underestimated. As an engineer, you might wonder how this topic can be of interest to an attorney. Well, attorneys play a crucial role in protecting their clients' interests, and corrosion prevention aligns seamlessly with legal strategies aimed at safeguarding assets. In this article, we will explore the legal implications of corrosion and the role attorneys can play in mitigating its risks.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo
;