banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Valuing a Professional Practice Requires In-depth Analysis

By: Michael Garibaldi
Tel: 516-288-7400
Email Mr. Garibaldi


View Profile on Experts.com.


Goodwill can be a significant asset for a professional practice. It may include both "personal" goodwill that's attributable to individual owners and "business" goodwill that can be transferred to third parties. When accountants and other types of professionals divorce, the amount of goodwill to include in the marital estate can become contentious (and may vary depending on state law). If expert testimony on the issue is inadequate, a court might look elsewhere for help, as it did in a recent Texas divorce case, Hill v. Hill.

A critical balance

The husband in the case became a principal at a Big Four accounting firm shortly after getting married. The partnership agreement provided that his sole interest in the firm was his required capital contribution.

In the case of "separation" - death, withdrawal or retirement - he would receive the balance of his capital account, less any amount he borrowed from the partnership. At the end of 2010, the husband's capital account held $715,000, and his loan balance was $700,900.

Experts disagree over value

At trial, the wife's expert used what was essentially an excess earnings method to value the husband's partnership interest. The expert found that the husband owned a 0.1% interest in the firm and his $1.5 million average annual income included $700,000 in replacement compensation based on comparable positions. This left $800,000 in income attributable to the husband's ownership interest (goodwill). The expert applied a 33.3% capitalization rate and concluded that the fair market value of the interest, including goodwill, was approximately $2.4 million.

The husband's expert conceded that a large professional practice could possess business goodwill, separate from individual partners' personal goodwill. But he stressed that the practice's governance was important when valuing interests in the firm. The expert opined that the only way the husband could access the value of his interest was to sell it back to the firm in case of separation. He therefore valued the interest at $14,100 - the difference between the capital account and the outstanding loan amount.

Courts weigh in

The trial court didn't agree with the husband's expert that the partnership agreement controlled the interest's value. However, it ultimately relied on the agreement to value that interest. In light of the lack of reliable evidence presented on the values of business and personal goodwill, the court concluded that the value of the husband's interest to include in the marital estate was $14,100.

The court of appeals affirmed, characterizing the expert testimony on the existence and availability of business goodwill as "vague and confusing." It pointed out that the wife's expert failed to distinguish between personal and business goodwill, while the husband's expert acknowledged business goodwill could exist but deemed the partnership agreement controlling.

Minimizing litigation risks

The appellate court in Hill observed that part of the problem was that the firm's partnership agreement lacked provisions addressing the valuation of a partner's interest. Ensure that your clients' buy-sell agreements stipulate a clear method for valuing ownership interests, ideally via an independent appraisal.


Michael J. Garibaldi, CPA, ABV, CFF, CGMA, has a strong background providing efficient and affordable solutions to the many complex issues facing the legal profession today. A Certified Public Accountant licensed by the State of New York, Mr. Garibaldi is Accredited in Business Valuation (ABV), and Certified in Financial Forensics (CFF) by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). He is recognized as a Chartered Global Management Accountant by the Association of International Certified Professional Accountants.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

Michael-Pakter-Forensic-Accounting-Expert-Photo.jpg

11/1/2017· Accounting

Determining a Distressed Debtor Company Discount Rate, Part 2

By: Michael D. Pakter

This is Part 2 of a two-part article. The first part (published in the January 2014 issue of Business Valuation Update) discussed valuations of distressed debtor companies based on discounted cash flows and considered the impact of the date and stage of distress. This part describes how the financial analyst derives the cost of capital for a distressed debtor company.

Fulcrum-Inquiry-Logo.jpg

8/16/2014· Accounting

Ninth Circuit Overturns Daubert Exclusion, Again Noting Trial Court Is A Gatekeeper, Not A Fact Finder

By: David Nolte

In a recent case involving the City of Pomona ("Pomona") v. SQM North America Corporation ("SQM"), Pomona alleged that SQM's importation of sodium nitrate for fertilizer caused a perchlorate contamination in the city. Although the district court excluded under Daubert the expert testimony of Pomona's expert witness on causation, the Ninth Circuit reversed the ruling, stating that "facts casting doubt on the credibility of an expert witness and contested facts regarding the strength of a particular scientific method are questions reserved for the fact finder". The case was remanded for trial.

expert_placeholder

11/25/2009· Accounting

The Bias in Annual (Versus Monthly) Discounting is Immaterial

By: Jay Abrams, ASA, CPA, MBA

This article presents a discussion of the validity of using the mid-year convention from a different point of view than the March 2002 BVR article by Michael Dobner.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo