banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Featured Articles

Search articles by title, description, author etc.
Sort Non-Featured Profiles
palmer-morrel-samuels-photo.jpg

3/21/2019· Employment

Who, What, and Where: Guidelines for the Statistical Analysis of Disparate Impact in EEO Litigation

By: Palmer Morrel-Samuels

This might come as a shock: Employees in large corporations sometimes mistakenly believe that they have been discriminated against. Admittedly, discrimination does occur, both in society and in the workplace. And as most attorneys know, many discrimination cases concern claims of either adverse treatment or adverse impact. In both types of litigation, employees believe that they have been discriminated against because of their minority status. In disparate treatment cases, plaintiffs must show that they were treated differently because of that status, and incriminating statements-express or implied-must be admitted as evidence to suggest a discriminatory intent. In contrast, disparate impact cases typically address the discriminatory impact of an ostensibly neutral policy, decision, or program, so plaintiffs rely upon objective data from the entire corporation to prove a discriminatory outcome.

Featured resources

Musculoskeletal
Musculoskeletal MRI (2nd ed.)

by Nancy M. Major, MD, et al

Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad
Unicourt Logo Button

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo