banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Do We Need To Warn Parents About The Dangers Of Playing Football?
The Goldhaber Warnings Report Vol II, February 2010

By: Gerald M. Goldhaber, Ph.D.
President & CEO GRA LLC

Office: (212)379-6661
Cell: (917)279-2303
Email Dr. Gerald Goldhaber


View Profile on Experts.com.


View PDF version of the Goldhaber Warnings Report

As I write this issue of the Goldhaber Warnings Report, the City of New Orleans is celebrating its NFL Football team's unexpected win in this year's Super Bowl. On the day after the New Orleans victory, the House Judiciary Committee convened its third hearing, in Houston, Texas, on football injuries. Unlike its previous hearings which addressed the NFL's lack of adequate protection against brain injuries, the Houston hearing focused on risks faced by younger football players. Several million high school and college students play football, and researchers now estimate that, according to an editorial in The Philadelphia Inquirer (Feb.7, 2010), young players suffer 140,000 concussions each year...with almost 1/2 of those injured returning to play so soon that they are at risk for even more serious brain injury. Given that so many of our youth are at risk for serious brain injury, the question must be asked if their parents are aware of such a risk.

Although it is somewhat dated, I conducted a national survey of 1007 parents of high school football players in 1993 to determine their awareness of the potential of severe brain injury from playing football. Overall, parents were uninformed about both the risk of severe brain injury and the football helmet warnings about that risk. Specifically, unprompted, most parents mentioned broken bones, knee injuries, sprains, or shoulder injuries as hazards associated with playing football. Few parents (only 6 out of 1007) mentioned severe brain damage. Even when prompted, only 25% mentioned the risk of brain injury. Further, the overwhelming majority of parents (78%) incorrectly believed that wearing a helmet generally eliminated the risk of severe brain injury. Very few parents (11%) had either received information about this risk (from any source) or were aware of the warning label on the helmet (37%). In short, parents, who in most states must approve their child's playing on the football team, were unaware of the severe risk of brain injury from playing football. We plan to repeat this survey this year, but I doubt the results will differ significantly. If you would like to read the complete results of my original survey, please consult the Journal of Athletic Training (Volume 28, Number 4, 1993, pp.306-311).

Feel free to pass this newsletter on to any of your friends and colleagues .


Dr. Gerald M. Goldhaber, the president of Goldhaber Research Associates, LLC, is a nationally recognized expert in the fields of political polling and warning label research. His clients include Fortune 500 companies, as well as educational and governmental organizations. He has conducted hundreds of surveys, including political polls for candidates running for U.S Congress, Senate, and President. Dr. Goldhaber also served as a consultant to President Reagan's Private Sector Survey for Cost Control.

Dr. Goldhaber has written and edited 10 books and is a frequent international lecturer on the topic of communication. He writes numerous articles on a variety of issues for publication in journals and newspapers across the country, and has served as a political analyst for numerous radio and television shows. He has been selected as a member of Who's Who in America and Who's Who in the World.

See Dr. Gerald Goldhaber's Profile on Experts.com.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

Goldhaber-Research-Associates-Logo.jpg

10/17/2013· Warnings & Labels

Synthetic Drug Retailers Sued By New York A.G. For Failure to Warn

By: Dr. Gerald M. Goldhaber

New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman filed 12 civil lawsuits on July 10,2012 throughout New York State against 16 head shops that sold synthetic drugs which were marketed as different products such as glass cleaner, potpourri, bath salts and spice. The main claim in these lawsuits is that the products violate consumer protection laws for labeling by failing to warn consumers of the products' content, safety and health risks.

expert_placeholder

5/29/2012· Warnings & Labels

Semantics in Court: Providing Opinions on likely Meanings of Messages

By: Dr. Michael T. Motley

My first expert witness case involved a man who was injured using a chinup bar designed to fit within a door frame. The bar has rubber suction cups at each end, and its length is adjusted by twisting its two sections together or apart for a telescoping effect.

Goldhaber-Research-Associates-Logo.jpg

11/19/2013· Warnings & Labels

Warning: Are Natural Foods Natural?

By: Dr. Gerald M. Goldhaber

Last month, two California mothers sued General Mills claiming that they falsely advertised and deceptively marketed its Nature Valley products as "natura1" when they contain highly processed ingredients such as high fructose com syrup, and high maltose corn syrup and maltodextrin, a thickener that also adds sweetness to food. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern Division of California and charges General Mills with false advertising and anticompetitiveness under California law.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo
;