Financial Economics Expert Jonathan Shefftz

JShefftz Consulting

Jonathan S. Shefftz

14 Moody Field Road

Amherst MA 01002
USA

phone: 413-256-1101

fax: 866-252-7130

Jonathan S. Shefftz is an independent consultant specializing in the application of financial economics to litigation disputes, regulatory enforcement, and public policy decisions. He has provided expert witness testimony on numerous lawsuits filed in state court, federal district court, and federal agency administrative hearings, in matters involving:

Economic Damages
Unjust Enrichment
Financial Capability Assessment
Municipal Financial Condition

Enforcement of Environmental Regulations

His articles have been published in the Litigation Economics Review, Natural Resources and Environment, and Environment Reporter. He has presented at conferences of the Eastern Economics Association and Western Economics Association International.

• View Mr. Shefftz's Curriculum Vitae

• View Mr. Shefftz Testimony History

• View Mr. Shefftz Partial Client List

• Watch Mr. Shefftz Enforcenomics Presentation

7/29/2011 · Economics

EPA's Economic Benefit Analysis Policy and Practice

By: Jonathan S. Shefftz

Compliance with environmental regulations often entails significant capital investment in pollution control equipment, which in turn leads to ongoing operation and maintenance expenses.

Read Article

10/21/2008 · Taxation

Taxation Considerations in Economic Damages Calculations

By: Jonathan S. Shefftz

Present value cash flow calculations for economic damages should be performed on an after-tax basis, regardless of whether the damages award will be subject to taxation

Read Article

6/28/2007 · Economics

Wrongful Profits: Setting The Record, And The Concept, Straight

By: Jonathan S. Shefftz

The Vermont Supreme Court’s decision in Agency of Natural Resources v. Deso11 does not, so to speak, throw the baby out with the bathwater, but rather sets forward what can be seen as constituting part of a helpful framework for distinguishing between the two. Nor does the decision contain any self-contradictory implications

Read Article