banner ad
Experts Logo

articles

Lost Compensation Settlement Tool Allows You To Assess Economic Damages Accurately And Efficiently, Under Various Scenarios

Originally Published in Financial Complexity Made Clear, March 2013

By: David Nolte
Tel: (213) 787-4100
Email Mr. Nolte

Website: www.fulcrum.com

View Profile on Experts.com.


Lost compensation is a method of capturing economic damages in personal injury, medical malpractice, wrongful termination, failure to promote and other similar torts. Independent damages experts are often employed to calculate lost compensation because of their unique background/skill set. However, the desire to minimize costs means that these experts are often employed after settlement efforts failed. This presents a difficult situation for counsel who are negotiating settlement without the benefit of the expert's opinion regarding damages.

Conceptually, lost compensation is what Plaintiff should have earned had the alleged incident not occurred (aka "but-for" compensation) less actual compensation (aka "mitigation"), discounted to present value. Although the concept may be relatively simple to describe, the data underlying the calculations varies significantly, as does the final result. The data underlying the calculations is a combination of (i) data specific to an individual Plaintiff and (ii) application of appropriate and credible statistics, all of which must be distilled into a proper methodology for damage computation.

Ideally one would have the full benefit of the testifying expert's opinions prior to settlement negotiations. However, access to an interactive settlement tool can provide counsel with the information necessary to provide meaningful advice to the client about appropriate damage amounts. This knowledge can also assist with settlement discussions in general by demonstrating that amounts requested/offered are based on application of defined inputs, properly applied.

The semi-automated model created by Fulcrum Inquiry calculates lost compensation based on Plaintiff specific inputs regarding dates, demographics and earnings, combined with government statistics, economic studies, and market conditions. Economic factors considered in the calculation include those generally accepted in these matters, such as:

  1. Future earnings and earnings growth
  2. Value of employment benefits
  3. Expected work life
  4. Present value discounts for future investment earnings

If necessary, the model can also be customized to include fact patterns that are unique to a particular case.

The interactive feature allows you to immediately see how various inputs affect the economic damage conclusion and enables scenario building. This facilitates preparation and assessment of settlement offers. Some of the more common points of disagreement amongst opposing sides of a lost earnings case include the appropriate discount rate, future earnings and earnings growth rates, and future employment fringe benefits. All of these variables/inputs (among others) can be altered in the model and presented in various combinations.

To provide an example, the following two damage calculations and accompanying graphics demonstrate the varying conclusions of the model changing just one important element, the discount rate (see article here regarding discount rates), while keeping all other inputs (e.g., Plaintiff's demographic and earnings data, trial date, future employment benefits, etc.) static:

Summary of Economic Damages with Fulcrum's Selected Discount Rate

Economic Damages

Summary of Economic Damages with a 10% Discount Rate

Economic Damages

The specific analysis presented in the above calculations and the accompanying graphics will demonstrate the thoughtful analysis underlying your settlement demand/offer.

Fulcrum Inquiry assists lawyers with economic damages associated with injury and employment matters, through both direct employment of experts and with our interactive settlement tool.


David Nolte is a principal at Fulcrum Financial Inquiry LLP with over 30 years experience performing forensic accounting, auditing, business appraisals, and related financial consulting. He regularly serves as an expert witness.

©Copyright - All Rights Reserved

DO NOT REPRODUCE WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION BY AUTHOR.

Related articles

Fulcrum-Inquiry-Logo.jpg

7/10/2013· Damages

Neither Expert Nor Inventor Allowed To Opine On Reasonable Royalty Damages

By: David Nolte

A Delaware federal court recently closed the door on each of two possible paths to damages for Plaintiff in the matter of AVM Technologies, LLC v. Intel, Inc. (Civil Action No. 10-610-RGA). U.S. District Judge Richard G. Andrews granted Defendant's motion to exclude Plaintiff's expert, while also granting Defendant's motion in limine to preclude any proposed expert testimony from the inventor of the patent in question.

11/25/2009· Damages

Forecasting Cash Flow: Mathematics of the Payout Ratio

By: Jay Abrams, ASA, CPA, MBA

We all have used the Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) method. Many of us would agree that it is generally the best, most comprehensive, theoretically correct valuation model. It also has an empirical reason to be the best, which is that many of us calculate our discount rates using the Ibbotson data in the SBBI annual yearbooks, which are based on publicly traded stock data.

abrams_valuation_logo.gif

11/25/2009· Damages

Lost Inventory and Lost Profits Damage Formulas in Litigation

By: Jay Abrams, ASA, CPA, MBA

This article arose from an actual litigation. To protect the identity of the parties, I usefictional names.

;
Experts.com-No broker Movie Ad
Unicourt Logo Button

Follow us

linkedin logo youtube logo rss feed logo